The company behind these scans is https://www.lumafield.com/ - a really cool way to do marketing for your product. Love it!
CT scans of batteries
11–20 of 76 posts
Re: CT scans of batteries
#12No 4680 cells, its 2170.
Re: CT scans of batteries
#13That seems like a missed opportunity for a watercooling pipe, or anything else to use that space effectively.
Re: CT scans of batteries
#14Re: CT scans of batteries
#15Or they could just read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battery_nomenclature, which describes the relevant IEC standard.
Re: CT scans of batteries
#16> We used the measuring tools in our Voyager analysis software to decode the model number: it seems to mean that the battery is 21mm in diameter and 70mm tall. Or they could just read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battery_nomenclature , which describes the relevant IEC standard.
Re: CT scans of batteries
#17Even in 2022, hijacking the scroll wheel still isn't cool or 1337.
Re: CT scans of batteries
#18> We used the measuring tools in our Voyager analysis software to decode the model number: it seems to mean that the battery is 21mm in diameter and 70mm tall. Or they could just read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battery_nomenclature , which describes the relevant IEC standard.
Re: CT scans of batteries
#19The Tesla 2170 cell has a big hole down the middle of it... That seems like a missed opportunity for a watercooling pipe, or anything else to use that space effectively.