Live data from Hacker News

NASA’s Webb takes star-filled portrait of Pillars of Creation

nasa.gov

11–20 of 196 posts

Re: NASA’s Webb takes star-filled portrait of Pillars of Creation

#12

Awe inspiring - can anyone point me to a description of the scale we're looking at? I'm sure it must be unimaginably large. What is the distance between the two top "arms" for example? Edit: easier to find than I imagined and Good Lord! https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/8tfo8i/the_amazing_s... Difficult to comprehend.

The photo here has a scale bar. https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/images/2022/052/01G...

Looks to be maybe 2 light years between those two arms.

Re: NASA’s Webb takes star-filled portrait of Pillars of Creation

#13

Awe inspiring - can anyone point me to a description of the scale we're looking at? I'm sure it must be unimaginably large. What is the distance between the two top "arms" for example? Edit: easier to find than I imagined and Good Lord! https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/8tfo8i/the_amazing_s... Difficult to comprehend.

The photo here has a scale bar. https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/images/2022/052/01G... Looks to be maybe 2 light years between those two arms.

Thank you.

Re: NASA’s Webb takes star-filled portrait of Pillars of Creation

#15
I understand Nebulae like the Eagle Nebula are fairly dynamic regions of space, so I find it interesting that we have photographs of the same region over a 27 years time span and at a glance, the structure of the Pillars of Creation appears virtually identical.

I understand that 27 years is minuscule on the cosmic timescale, but what order of timescale would be necessary for the evolution of Pillars of Creation to be are apparent to a casual observer? hundreds of years? thousands?

Re: NASA’s Webb takes star-filled portrait of Pillars of Creation

#17
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

IIRC it is radiation bouncing off its clumps of hydrogen from nearby stars.

Ah, so radiation is being emitted and blocked in a way that coincides to the way we interpret 3d objects, is that right? Because if it would be uniform, the bright orange colors would be uniformly distributed?

> so radiation is being emitted and blocked in a way that coincides to the way we interpret 3d objects

It's not coincidental, this is how our vision works.

Re: NASA’s Webb takes star-filled portrait of Pillars of Creation

#20
post #15

I understand Nebulae like the Eagle Nebula are fairly dynamic regions of space, so I find it interesting that we have photographs of the same region over a 27 years time span and at a glance, the structure of the Pillars of Creation appears virtually identical. I understand that 27 years is minuscule on the cosmic timescale, but what order of timescale would be necessary for the evolution of Pillars of Creation to be…

A bit more cosmic scale that we can see over time are light echos: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_echo

In particular, the at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V838_Monocerotis there's a video of the echo.

For another dynamic area with things changing on a human lifespan, the black hole at the center of the galaxy we can watch stars orbit it. https://youtu.be/XA7CAVm31z0

Post reply on HN