Live data from Hacker News

Amazon’s attrition costs $8B annually according to leaked documents

engadget.com

11–20 of 129 posts

Re: Amazon’s attrition costs $8B annually according to leaked documents

#11

> "only one out of three new hires in 2021" stay with the company for 90 or more days. This is truly amazing. I'm guessing the warehouse biz has the most effect on this stat, but still. Wow.

I recently did a contract with a company in the logistics (warehouse/delivery) business for a product you've heard of. Their turnover rate is over 100% every year. The industry is crazy.

Re: Amazon’s attrition costs $8B annually according to leaked documents

#12

> "only one out of three new hires in 2021" stay with the company for 90 or more days. This is truly amazing. I'm guessing the warehouse biz has the most effect on this stat, but still. Wow.

>This is truly amazing. Amazing in a bad way... but I believe it. The person who told me " autistic people can't work for RAND " was hired by Amazon. I'd blacklisted them by that point -- I don't like when folks treat a good faith interview like a free consulting session. The company culture reminds me of some kind of suicide cult - treating a job interview like a free consulting session might work if you're looking…

> Amazing in a bad way...

The word you folks are looking for is “appalling”.

Re: Amazon’s attrition costs $8B annually according to leaked documents

#13

> "only one out of three new hires in 2021" stay with the company for 90 or more days. This is truly amazing. I'm guessing the warehouse biz has the most effect on this stat, but still. Wow.

I knew two people who quit after two weeks. One after being called to find out why he wasn’t at work. On a Sunday.

I ended up on a short contract and think I understand why. I also understand why Amazon employees are notorious for taking up the entire sidewalk like nobody else is there. Trauma.

Re: Amazon’s attrition costs $8B annually according to leaked documents

#14

> The same Times investigation reported the company “intentionally limited upward mobility for hourly workers,” according to David Niekerk, a former Amazon HR Vice President. It’s not just for hourly workers. I was actively coached on holding promotions as a carrot. My leadership team would commit to unrealistic dates, taking input and estimates from dev teams but hand wave it. Amazon applies pressure on L7 and L6 so…

Reminds me of a memorable quote from "halt and catch fire" that changed my workplace-attitude forever: “I’m so sick of hearing about the future” “What is that?” “The future is just another crappy version of the present. It’s some … it’s some bribe people offer you to make you do what they want instead of what you want.”

It stopped working (mostly overtime) on promises that were impossible to keep. In return I got more sleep, social life and very recently a different job.

Re: Amazon’s attrition costs $8B annually according to leaked documents

#15

> "only one out of three new hires in 2021" stay with the company for 90 or more days. This is truly amazing. I'm guessing the warehouse biz has the most effect on this stat, but still. Wow.

In 1913, Ford hired more than 52,000 men to keep a workforce of only 14,000 [1]

It sounds amazing, but it's not original. It says something about where we're at, as a country,

[1] https://www.payscale.com/compensation-trends/curb-employee-t...

Re: Amazon’s attrition costs $8B annually according to leaked documents

#17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What an incredibly stupid way to run a company.

It’s actually not stupid. It’s genius. If you can do it at scale without damaging the company’s reputation, you’ve won the lottery. You make big promises to employees, maybe give a carrot to a very select few. Everyone else will either accept the long hours and grueling culture or they’ll leave, and if they leave, they’ll go before their RSU compensation vests. So the other thing you do is weigh compensation heavily…

> If you can do it at scale without damaging the company’s reputation

Everyone I know who’s worked for Amazon has said the money was great but everything else absolutely sucked. And they all held out doing whatever they had to in order to get by until they vested, and we’re instantly out.

I don’t think Amazon has a good reputation.

Re: Amazon’s attrition costs $8B annually according to leaked documents

#19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What an incredibly stupid way to run a company.

It’s actually not stupid. It’s genius. If you can do it at scale without damaging the company’s reputation, you’ve won the lottery. You make big promises to employees, maybe give a carrot to a very select few. Everyone else will either accept the long hours and grueling culture or they’ll leave, and if they leave, they’ll go before their RSU compensation vests. So the other thing you do is weigh compensation heavily…

> It’s actually not stupid. It’s genius.

It's genius if you don't have a shred of ethics left in your bones.

Re: Amazon’s attrition costs $8B annually according to leaked documents

#20

> The same Times investigation reported the company “intentionally limited upward mobility for hourly workers,” according to David Niekerk, a former Amazon HR Vice President. It’s not just for hourly workers. I was actively coached on holding promotions as a carrot. My leadership team would commit to unrealistic dates, taking input and estimates from dev teams but hand wave it. Amazon applies pressure on L7 and L6 so…

> And the Indian devs work their ass off out of fear of getting PIP’d and with their work authorization, they lose their job means they have to leave the country.

This matches what I saw at Nike. Though it was a bit less extreme, it was the same dynamic. Indian-born workers got paid half what the American-born workers did for the same SWE jobs. And Indian workers couldn’t complain or push back against unrealistic expectations because getting fired meant getting deported. It’s a captive, exploitable labor force. It’s really messed up.

Post reply on HN