VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration
11–20 of 176 posts
Re: VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration
#12The last time I tried this, it was so bad that I had to drastically decrease the window size to get reasonable performance. As in, it would basically lock up above a certain window size, and no reasonable amount of waiting would get it to respond. (And yes, I fiddled with all of the obvious knobs for CPU/memory/graphics/etc.) I figure in this day and age of AWS and the like, we should have very, very good open source virtualization software, but no amount of fiddling seems to get it to work well for me.
Re: VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration
#13Re: VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration
#14Has anyone had luck getting decent GUI performance (macOS host, Linux guest)? I don't need 3D, just sane 2D performance. The last time I tried this, it was so bad that I had to drastically decrease the window size to get reasonable performance. As in, it would basically lock up above a certain window size, and no reasonable amount of waiting would get it to respond. (And yes, I fiddled with all of the obvious knobs f…
(Note: This is for the next major release of Mac OS.)
Re: VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
What do people use who run an M1/M2 based Mac but want to run an x86 VM? Because you can't do this with Virtualbox.
UTM. It's qemu under the hood and will emulate x86 if you want it to. (Or other architectures, it runs Mac OS 9 under an emulated PowerPC perfectly. Great fun.) But it's not quick. I would not attempt to run a modern Windows on it, I don't think it would work due to a lack of performance.
"Securely run operating systems on your Mac"
Re: VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration
#16What value does vm encryption have? I’d rather encrypt my host and leave my vms unencrypted, given it would be possible to back door virtual box binaries given an unencrypted file system, or keylog keys assuming a remote breach.
virtualbox over the years is very helpful to me and I'm grateful for it. The only problem I had is that it can not handle high throughput under stress(e.g. build full Android release leads to filesystem corruption), for 99% of the time it is very usable.
Re: VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration
#17Is there a way to stop vbox from phoning home to Oracle?
Re: VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration
#18Has anyone had luck getting decent GUI performance (macOS host, Linux guest)? I don't need 3D, just sane 2D performance. The last time I tried this, it was so bad that I had to drastically decrease the window size to get reasonable performance. As in, it would basically lock up above a certain window size, and no reasonable amount of waiting would get it to respond. (And yes, I fiddled with all of the obvious knobs f…
The native display managers for XFCE, MATE, and (I believe) KDE allow you to disable compositing. GNOME and Unity's native display managers don't (AFAIK). I have no idea if display compositing can be disabled on macOS.
Re: VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration
#19What value does vm encryption have? I’d rather encrypt my host and leave my vms unencrypted, given it would be possible to back door virtual box binaries given an unencrypted file system, or keylog keys assuming a remote breach.
Re: VirtualBox 7.0 Released – Full VM Encryption Support, New Direct3D Acceleration
#20Has anyone had luck getting decent GUI performance (macOS host, Linux guest)? I don't need 3D, just sane 2D performance. The last time I tried this, it was so bad that I had to drastically decrease the window size to get reasonable performance. As in, it would basically lock up above a certain window size, and no reasonable amount of waiting would get it to respond. (And yes, I fiddled with all of the obvious knobs f…
The only way I've been able to get good virtualized 2D performance without providing a GPU directly to the VM has been to use a display manager where you can disable compositing. Otherwise, you end up having to use a software 3D rasterizer like LLVMpipe, which can be quite slow. The native display managers for XFCE, MATE, and (I believe) KDE allow you to disable compositing. GNOME and Unity's native display managers…
e: my memory slips me, I've already run vulkan apps in qemu.
> [lexi@arch-steam ~]$ vkcube
> Selected GPU 0: Virtio-GPU Venus (Intel(R) UHD Graphics (CML GT2)), type: 1
Granted this was ChromeOS[0], but ultimately it's the same qemu. You just need the right flags and for the guest to have a mesa driver aware of virtio-gpu.