11–20 of 25 posts
> The method (eSupplement) states the study was conduce between February and October 2020. That surprises me because the vaccinations being studied were not available to the public for that entire period. The first dose outside a clinical trial was given in Queens, New York on December 14 that year. Before this, they were only available as part of trials which excluded lactating individuals.
I suppose it's not unexpected in that pregnant women have to avoid most vaccinations for the same reason. What is shocking is that "trusted news" claimed this wasn't true just last year. You'd think the vaccine cured cancer with just how perfect the news portrayed it to be. Without delving into conspiracy theory it does certainly seem like 2020-2021 was the greatest period of sponsored, deliberate, misinformation spr…
> pregnant women have to avoid most vaccinations for the same reason. Is it most? Flu, pertussis, hepatitis are all recommended during pregnancy. Is it a live vs inactive distinction?
[1] https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/vaccines-during-p...
I suppose it's not unexpected in that pregnant women have to avoid most vaccinations for the same reason. What is shocking is that "trusted news" claimed this wasn't true just last year. You'd think the vaccine cured cancer with just how perfect the news portrayed it to be. Without delving into conspiracy theory it does certainly seem like 2020-2021 was the greatest period of sponsored, deliberate, misinformation spr…
I suppose it's not unexpected in that pregnant women have to avoid most vaccinations for the same reason. What is shocking is that "trusted news" claimed this wasn't true just last year. You'd think the vaccine cured cancer with just how perfect the news portrayed it to be. Without delving into conspiracy theory it does certainly seem like 2020-2021 was the greatest period of sponsored, deliberate, misinformation spr…
Quoted post unavailable.
The comment on that page: > The method (eSupplement) states the study was conduce between February and October 2020. That surprises me because the vaccinations being studied were not available to the public for that entire period. The first dose outside a clinical trial was given in Queens, New York on December 14 that year. Before this, they were only available as part of trials which excluded lactating individuals.
Is this surprising? A lot of medicines pass to breast milk and are not recommended n that cases. I'm not sure if someone has tried with mRNA before. > This study investigated whether the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA can be detected in the expressed breast milk (EBM) of lactating individuals receiving the vaccination within 6 months after delivery. Perhaps my English is bad, but IIUC the abstract makes the question if there…
> Perhaps my English is bad,
Now I think I misunderstood this part. It's 6 months after "delivering" the children, not 6 months after "delivering" the vaccine.
The comment on that page: > The method (eSupplement) states the study was conduce between February and October 2020. That surprises me because the vaccinations being studied were not available to the public for that entire period. The first dose outside a clinical trial was given in Queens, New York on December 14 that year. Before this, they were only available as part of trials which excluded lactating individuals.
Seems likely that this is a typo which should have said 2021.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Seems likely that this is a typo which should have said 2021.
Do you have access to the full text version? It would be nice to know the number of participants and the concentration of mRNA in the milk.
To me, the concerns this raises have less to do with breastfeeding infants and more to do with biodistribution of the mRNA after vaccination -- in theory it's not "supposed" to be found anywhere other than the muscle tissue around the injection site.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you have access to the full text version? It would be nice to know the number of participants and the concentration of mRNA in the milk.
Some details on this Twitter thread: https://twitter.com/VikiLovesFACS/status/1574663804801388547 To me, the concerns this raises have less to do with breastfeeding infants and more to do with biodistribution of the mRNA after vaccination -- in theory it's not "supposed" to be found anywhere other than the muscle tissue around the injection site.
> The authors conclude that the very low levels found suggest that mRNA COVID vaccination is safe during breastfeeding, and this is in line with the findings of other safety in breastfeeding studies,
It would be nice to have a quote from the research article.
> Assuming this mRNA was active vaccine, how much milk would we need to make a dose? For a 100 mg dose of Moderna, about 50 bathtubs. For a 30 mg dose of Pfizer, only 15. Or for a pediatric dose (10mg), only 5 bathtubs.
Other user>> if it work via ingestion we would not need to inject them (i would be damn glad for it :) :) )
I suppose it's not unexpected in that pregnant women have to avoid most vaccinations for the same reason. What is shocking is that "trusted news" claimed this wasn't true just last year. You'd think the vaccine cured cancer with just how perfect the news portrayed it to be. Without delving into conspiracy theory it does certainly seem like 2020-2021 was the greatest period of sponsored, deliberate, misinformation spr…
With the way censorship is going, our grandchildren will be reading the "corrected" version of this, at best.