Parallel Economy: Censor-Resistant Payment Processing
11–20 of 92 posts
Re: Parallel Economy: Censor-Resistant Payment Processing
#12Re: Parallel Economy: Censor-Resistant Payment Processing
#13I don't get it, seems like it is still using visa/MasterCard? Aren't they the ones at the root of most issues?
It may turn out to be a marketing gimmick but it seems to me like there's a niche for a high risk payment processor that focuses on the perceived risk of being "cancelled" as the risk they help manage. How they'll deal with all the other issues a high-risk processor has to handle is something I'm curious about.
Re: Parallel Economy: Censor-Resistant Payment Processing
#14There continues to be good money in playing the middleman, I suppose.
Re: Parallel Economy: Censor-Resistant Payment Processing
#15> Cancel culture will not win But what are they doing to actually prevent censorship? This feels like an excuse to capitalize on the politically charged term of “cancel culture”. My grift alert is blaring.
> But what are they doing to actually prevent censorship? Payment processing. edit: I have to say that I'm finding the replies unintelligible. The largest payment processors are banning organizations from receiving payments. This organization claims that they will not do that. Would that destroy censorship in the world, or keep Visa and Mastercard from banning people (or banning Parallel Economy themselves?) No. Does…
Re: Parallel Economy: Censor-Resistant Payment Processing
#16> Cancel culture will not win But what are they doing to actually prevent censorship? This feels like an excuse to capitalize on the politically charged term of “cancel culture”. My grift alert is blaring.
> But what are they doing to actually prevent censorship? Payment processing. edit: I have to say that I'm finding the replies unintelligible. The largest payment processors are banning organizations from receiving payments. This organization claims that they will not do that. Would that destroy censorship in the world, or keep Visa and Mastercard from banning people (or banning Parallel Economy themselves?) No. Does…
As best as I can tell this is basically security through obscurity.
Re: Parallel Economy: Censor-Resistant Payment Processing
#17"Tech tyrants and authoritarians want to dictate speech — and commerce." Really?
Re: Parallel Economy: Censor-Resistant Payment Processing
#18> Cancel culture will not win But what are they doing to actually prevent censorship? This feels like an excuse to capitalize on the politically charged term of “cancel culture”. My grift alert is blaring.
> But what are they doing to actually prevent censorship? Payment processing. edit: I have to say that I'm finding the replies unintelligible. The largest payment processors are banning organizations from receiving payments. This organization claims that they will not do that. Would that destroy censorship in the world, or keep Visa and Mastercard from banning people (or banning Parallel Economy themselves?) No. Does…
In other words: is the "censorship resistance" here just the pinky promise of someone who unironically writes a page like this[1]?
Re: Parallel Economy: Censor-Resistant Payment Processing
#19Re: Parallel Economy: Censor-Resistant Payment Processing
#20That's a good company name. The broader the cancellations, the broader the emerging parallel economy. Every case of a corporation refusing a customer is an opportunity for another to accept. In a relatively free market you don't extinguish a sector by dividing it; that just generates targetted support. Media is dividing along partisan lines and apparently payment processing is too. What else? How broad will the paral…