46% of ETH POS post merge is just two addresses
11–20 of 49 posts
Re: 46% of ETH POS post merge is just two addresses
#12I tend towards the theory that POS is more centralizing than POW, and the question is will it stay decentralized or end up with one address (or rather one entity) controlling 50%? With POW a miner needs to continually provide new investments to be competitive, with new and more effective hardware and electricity. But with POS you can just keep your coins in one place, and it will keep building up with no new investme…
Fraudsters have a strong incentive to maintain a patina of integrity (for their given industry)
Re: 46% of ETH POS post merge is just two addresses
#13https://twitter.com/thwjanssen89/status/1570426961411067904?...
comment?
Re: 46% of ETH POS post merge is just two addresses
#14Can someone explain what this means to us not in the loop?
Re: 46% of ETH POS post merge is just two addresses
#15I tend towards the theory that POS is more centralizing than POW, and the question is will it stay decentralized or end up with one address (or rather one entity) controlling 50%? With POW a miner needs to continually provide new investments to be competitive, with new and more effective hardware and electricity. But with POS you can just keep your coins in one place, and it will keep building up with no new investme…
Re: 46% of ETH POS post merge is just two addresses
#16Re: 46% of ETH POS post merge is just two addresses
#17Reminds me of my favorite crypto joke: "cryptocurrency is an alternate banking system for people whose primary complaint about the 2008 financial crisis was that they weren't _in_ on it."
Re: 46% of ETH POS post merge is just two addresses
#18Re: 46% of ETH POS post merge is just two addresses
#19[deleted]
Re: 46% of ETH POS post merge is just two addresses
#20Reminds me of my favorite crypto joke: "cryptocurrency is an alternate banking system for people whose primary complaint about the 2008 financial crisis was that they weren't _in_ on it."