German digital signage ban prompts confusion
11–20 of 457 posts
Re: German digital signage ban prompts confusion
#12Quoted post unavailable.
Re: German digital signage ban prompts confusion
#13Re: German digital signage ban prompts confusion
#14I wish the whole world would do this stuff. Light pollution sucks. It's understandable from street lights but other sources aren't as excusable.
These days I think disrupting wildlife is more important than human safety and I wish we could get rid of nearly all street lighting.
Re: German digital signage ban prompts confusion
#15This is going to be interesting to watch, as many low-end digital signage solutions do not have the ability to fully shut off the displays they’re attached to (and I suspect some high-end billboards will have displays fully decoupled from media players, etc.)
Re: German digital signage ban prompts confusion
#16I wish the whole world would do this stuff. Light pollution sucks. It's understandable from street lights but other sources aren't as excusable.
- shift from low-pressure sodium lamps (which emit 95%+ of light in the narrow peak, so are a bit easier to filter out in astronomy application, and also don't trigger blue-light neural response in humans, and animals alike) to LEDs (which pollute across the visible spectrum, with plenty of blue light component);
- as light efficiency increases, people often choose to utilize it to increase lighting intensity within same electric power budget, rather than keep same output in lumens, and save some power.
Re: German digital signage ban prompts confusion
#17Quoted post unavailable.
Re: German digital signage ban prompts confusion
#18This will chiefly affect commercial billboards and the like, which should not be even allowed to ever emit light (or exist) IMNSHO.
Just such a waste of energy. I wish advertising should only be forbidden to use active lighting at all.
Re: German digital signage ban prompts confusion
#19This is a cult. Government is implementing micromanaging measure which may reduce energy consumtion by 1%, but on the other hand they do not want to extend the lifetime of nuclear reactors for a few years to help transition, because those 3% that they contribute are not worth it.