Live data from Hacker News

Handshake – Decentralized naming and certificate authority

handshake.org

11–20 of 104 posts

Re: Handshake – Decentralized naming and certificate authority

#11
post #7
post #5

> Handshake is a UTXO-based blockchain protocol which manages the registration, renewal and transfer of DNS top-level domains (TLDs). > The full node daemon, hsd, is written in Javascript and is a fork of bcoin. Personally, not the future I’m looking for.

Sadly namecheap bought into this, so it’s being forced down the throats of people who don’t quite realize that the domains they can buy on the service can not, and will not ever be usable. It’s pretty obvious to even the most casual of observers that this is just yet another cryptocurrency scheme designed to fleece as many people as possible.

This is very unfair to namecheap:

1. The search bar on their homepage returns no handbrake results

2. To get to those results in the first place you have to click on a 'Handbrake' tab (leaving the 'Domains' tab)

3. The search results link to an info page that clearly states "It's also important to note that handshake domains do not resolve in regular browsers without additional setup."

For the record, I think Handbrake is a doomed project and a bad investment for Namecheap, but I don't think that means we can just accuse Namecheap of "forcing it down the throats of people".

Re: Handshake – Decentralized naming and certificate authority

#12
post #6

Another similar and interesting project, and which is not blockchain-based, is the GNU Name System: https://www.gnunet.org/en/gns.html

> a secure, decentralized name system built on top of GNUnet.

https://www.gnunet.org/en/install.html

> It is largely not yet ready for usage beyond developers.

Still in development, not ready for average joe.

Re: Handshake – Decentralized naming and certificate authority

#14
post #9

The problem they'll have is more and more TLDs are colluding with ICANN's, and Handshake chose to sell "TLDs", plus it is a proof of work blockchain. Dappy has a .d scoping at the top to avoid collisions, POS blockchain behind it, a co-resolution system (IP addresses and root certificates are always co-resolved), and it allows multi-ownership of names. Worth checking out https://dappy.tech/

Did you mean colliding, as in overlapping? Colluding is cooperating in a secret/unlawful way.

Re: Handshake – Decentralized naming and certificate authority

#15

More salient question than "is blockchain DNS a good idea": How did they get this domain name?

handshake.org doesn't seem like a too rare find. It was unoccupied for a long time and nothing serious seems to be there before: https://web.archive.org/web/20220201000000*/handshake.org

My guess would be it was in the $3-8k range.

Re: Handshake – Decentralized naming and certificate authority

#18

If I could change one thing about root replacement, it would be for a more efficient use of the hierarchical structure of the DNS. The attempt to cram everything into a namespace that is mostly flat is, in my opinion, essentially intractable.

Good point about DNS.

Re: Handshake – Decentralized naming and certificate authority

#19

> Handshake uses proof-of-work mining Uh, no thanks. If you insist on using a blockchain at least don't make it proof-of-work. It's 2022, and there are plenty of production-ready non-PoW chains out there already. Please stop killing the planet.

I can't agree with this more.

Re: Handshake – Decentralized naming and certificate authority

#20
post #7
post #5

> Handshake is a UTXO-based blockchain protocol which manages the registration, renewal and transfer of DNS top-level domains (TLDs). > The full node daemon, hsd, is written in Javascript and is a fork of bcoin. Personally, not the future I’m looking for.

Sadly namecheap bought into this, so it’s being forced down the throats of people who don’t quite realize that the domains they can buy on the service can not, and will not ever be usable. It’s pretty obvious to even the most casual of observers that this is just yet another cryptocurrency scheme designed to fleece as many people as possible.

Why would you say sadly? This is right up Namecheap's alley.

Tip: find a phishing domain -- either SMS or via some search -- and check the WHOIS. It's always the same registrar. Then try to report it and see how it goes.

Post reply on HN