Live data from Hacker News

Starlink Maritime

starlink.com

11–20 of 530 posts

Re: Starlink Maritime

#11
post #9
post #4

"$5,000/mo with a one-time hardware cost of $10,000 for two high performance terminals." wow! Why cant you just take your normal starlink with you on your boat? Don't people do that with RVs?

"Starlink for RVs is not designed for use while in motion." Marine starlink needs to compensate for rolling, pitching, and forward motion.

Sounds like they added a gimbal or something?

Re: Starlink Maritime

#12
post #4

"$5,000/mo with a one-time hardware cost of $10,000 for two high performance terminals." wow! Why cant you just take your normal starlink with you on your boat? Don't people do that with RVs?

Look at the coverage map: https://api.starlink.com/public-files/maritime-coverage-map....

What a fucking joke. "coming soon" means nothing to me coming from a Musk company.

Compare to the iridum network: https://www.groundcontrol.com/us/knowledge/calculators-and-m...

Granted, iridium is much slower. But $5k a month for barely any coverage is an insult.

Re: Starlink Maritime

#13
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Would only work near shore, this must mean they have some capability to go beyond the one hop to a station. Edit: from the coverage map it looks like this is only coastal waters…

Interesting. I didn't know that coverage was limited. I assumed satellite == pretty much all of earth.

It will once they get the laser terminals up and running so the sats can talk to each other

Re: Starlink Maritime

#15
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Would only work near shore, this must mean they have some capability to go beyond the one hop to a station. Edit: from the coverage map it looks like this is only coastal waters…

Interesting. I didn't know that coverage was limited. I assumed satellite == pretty much all of earth.

They can't do satellite to satellite yet. Just terminal -> sat -> ground station. Starlink is in low earth orbit, so the visibility any one satellite has is (relatively speaking) pretty limited.

Re: Starlink Maritime

#16
post #4

"$5,000/mo with a one-time hardware cost of $10,000 for two high performance terminals." wow! Why cant you just take your normal starlink with you on your boat? Don't people do that with RVs?

Look at the coverage map: https://api.starlink.com/public-files/maritime-coverage-map.... What a fucking joke. "coming soon" means nothing to me coming from a Musk company. Compare to the iridum network: https://www.groundcontrol.com/us/knowledge/calculators-and-m... Granted, iridium is much slower. But $5k a month for barely any coverage is an insult.

Do you think running Starlink is cheap? Something seems to have struck a nerve.

Re: Starlink Maritime

#17
post #11
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Starlink for RVs is not designed for use while in motion." Marine starlink needs to compensate for rolling, pitching, and forward motion.

Sounds like they added a gimbal or something?

These are common on radar systems, and nothing to sneeze at.

Re: Starlink Maritime

#19
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Would only work near shore, this must mean they have some capability to go beyond the one hop to a station. Edit: from the coverage map it looks like this is only coastal waters…

Interesting. I didn't know that coverage was limited. I assumed satellite == pretty much all of earth.

The majority of their satellites just bounce the signals back down to a nearby ground station. Their version 1.5 sats, which they started launching about a year ago, include laser links to allow sat->sat communication. Their plan is for the remaining 3/4th of their fleet to have laser links.

One interesting side-effect of the laser links is that they can open up connections between stock exchanges and trading houses that are faster than direct fiberoptic lines. Milliseconds count in high frequency trading.

Re: Starlink Maritime

#20
post #4

"$5,000/mo with a one-time hardware cost of $10,000 for two high performance terminals." wow! Why cant you just take your normal starlink with you on your boat? Don't people do that with RVs?

Look at the coverage map: https://api.starlink.com/public-files/maritime-coverage-map.... What a fucking joke. "coming soon" means nothing to me coming from a Musk company. Compare to the iridum network: https://www.groundcontrol.com/us/knowledge/calculators-and-m... Granted, iridium is much slower. But $5k a month for barely any coverage is an insult.

-- coverage is literally perfect for anywhere I take my (imaginary) yacht! - south of france? check! italian riviera? check! miami? Check! LA? Check! $5k a month? In YachtLand $5/mth is pocket change --
Post reply on HN