Live data from Hacker News

World Population Clock: 7.96B People (2022)

worldometers.info

11–20 of 191 posts

Re: World Population Clock: 7.96B People (2022)

#11
post #2

Happy to see the world population growing. Unlike many here I don't believe the world is overpopulated and that we need more people to grow and expand beyond the planet. Located in the U.S. where we could double the population without starting to feel cramped. We can and we should.

Overpopulation isn’t really about running out of space or feeling cramped, it’s about not having enough resources to sustainably support the population.

Re: World Population Clock: 7.96B People (2022)

#12
post #2

Happy to see the world population growing. Unlike many here I don't believe the world is overpopulated and that we need more people to grow and expand beyond the planet. Located in the U.S. where we could double the population without starting to feel cramped. We can and we should.

> Located in the U.S. where we could double the population without starting to feel cramped.

You're already running out of resources: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-03-11/californ...

Re: World Population Clock: 7.96B People (2022)

#13
post #2

Happy to see the world population growing. Unlike many here I don't believe the world is overpopulated and that we need more people to grow and expand beyond the planet. Located in the U.S. where we could double the population without starting to feel cramped. We can and we should.

I'm sure the US could feed all those people but can the planet survive doubling US greenhouse gas emissions?

Feeding is going to be a lot harder as more land is eroded.

Though the US could cut emissions in the neighborhood of entire developed countries in Europe right now if they just stopped military spending.

Re: World Population Clock: 7.96B People (2022)

#14
post #2

Happy to see the world population growing. Unlike many here I don't believe the world is overpopulated and that we need more people to grow and expand beyond the planet. Located in the U.S. where we could double the population without starting to feel cramped. We can and we should.

The US produce 14% of global emissions and consume a disproportionate amount of resources in general.

As things stand, doubling of US population would be a global disaster.

Re: World Population Clock: 7.96B People (2022)

#15
post #6
post #2

Happy to see the world population growing. Unlike many here I don't believe the world is overpopulated and that we need more people to grow and expand beyond the planet. Located in the U.S. where we could double the population without starting to feel cramped. We can and we should.

Because you live in the wealthiest country in the world (over 100 continuous years of highest GDP) with high salaries and lots of habitable space (from exterminating the native populace). But that's not sustainable - the US has the highest CO2 emissions per capita when you factor in imports, etc. nevermind other environmental damage. And is also dependent on terrible conditions in Asia, etc. to produce all the cheap…

We’re on track for electric cars to overtake gas cars in twenty years. Nuclear power is making a comeback. Even electric planes are in the wings. Best of all, lab-grown meat is here now and we’re just waiting for the price to come down. It seems as though we’ll have solved our emissions issues by the next generation.

Would you still argue against a higher population once we largely solve the emissions issues? Or is there a more fundamental reason you’re against a higher population?

Re: World Population Clock: 7.96B People (2022)

#16
post #2

Happy to see the world population growing. Unlike many here I don't believe the world is overpopulated and that we need more people to grow and expand beyond the planet. Located in the U.S. where we could double the population without starting to feel cramped. We can and we should.

> Located in the U.S. where we could double the population without starting to feel cramped. You're already running out of resources: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-03-11/californ...

In that case the population is dominated by the suicidally bad water management in CA. You could cut the population by 99% and you would still have a looming water crisis there.

If you build a solar energy farm on the dark side of the moon you shouldn't be blaming the people who want to use the energy, you should be blaming the people who managed the project.

Re: World Population Clock: 7.96B People (2022)

#18
post #2

Happy to see the world population growing. Unlike many here I don't believe the world is overpopulated and that we need more people to grow and expand beyond the planet. Located in the U.S. where we could double the population without starting to feel cramped. We can and we should.

Personally I'd be okay with the population being 10% its current value (though I don't see any non-apocalyptic way of that coming to be). In any case, I think we should decrease our population to whatever extent possible. But I guess that's just my opinion. edit: I'm not really sure why you're being down-voted. You're just expressing your opinion here.

yeah... and it would be great if decrease in quantity would come with increase of quality. People themselves, their life conditions, human life appreciation all that stuff you know. (Cause I do not understand why would somebody want 2x of fat dolts).

Re: World Population Clock: 7.96B People (2022)

#19
My great-grandma was born in 1920 and died in 2020. She was lucid to her final breath. I spent a lot of time talking to her about the ‘before times’.

She was a sucker for this new world. She loved it. Much more than her world from the 20s. However, she always reminisced about how empty of people and how natural everything was.

We were 1.6 billion when she was born, almost 8 when she died. This is the lifespan of a single (long lived) individual.

Re: World Population Clock: 7.96B People (2022)

#20
post #2

Happy to see the world population growing. Unlike many here I don't believe the world is overpopulated and that we need more people to grow and expand beyond the planet. Located in the U.S. where we could double the population without starting to feel cramped. We can and we should.

People are like Replicants: we're "either a benefit or a hazard".

If the population increases in a system where there is enough access to good education, and enough economic opportunity, to advance humanity's knowledge, we will be fine.

If the population increases in a system with too much ignorance and destitution, we are in trouble.

Post reply on HN