Live data from Hacker News

An experiment to test if Bionic Reading helps you read faster

blog.readwise.io

11–20 of 100 posts

Re: An experiment to test if Bionic Reading helps you read faster

#11
post #10

I find it really difficult and annoying -- and thereby slow -- to read with these "fixation" points as that's just not how I feel eyes work... I want my eyes to scan across the text rather than ratcheting from one word to the next word, which is both slow and exhausting. The words and "fixation" is thereby just a massive distraction. Hell: if I really really need to read quickly I try to do this thing where I scan my…

[deleted]

Re: An experiment to test if Bionic Reading helps you read faster

#12
Here are some bookmarklets I developed to cut out the extra formatting, bolding, and other content on websites that makes them difficult to read. I would appreciate any feedback or modifications for improvement.

Literata font with a peach background color to optimize reading speed and no selective bolding:

javascript:void function(){javascript:(function(){var a=Math.floor,b=document.querySelectorAll("p, title, a, ul"),c=[],e="",f="",g="",h=0,k=0,l="",m="",n=window.open("","_blank");for(var d in b){var i=b[d].textContent;i%26%26(c=c+"\n"+i)}for(f=c,e=f.replace(/\n/g,"
"),g=e.split(" "),h=0;h"+g[h].substring(0,k)+""+g[h].substring(k,g[h].length)+" ","."==g[h].substring(g[h].length-1,g[h].length)%26%26(l+=" "),m+=l;n.document.write(""+m+"

")})()}();

Selective bolding with a peach background for those who find a benefit:

javascript:void function(){javascript:(function(){var a=Math.floor,b=document.querySelectorAll("p, title, a, ul"),c=[],e="",f="",g="",h=0,k=0,l="",m="",n=window.open("","_blank");for(var d in b){var i=b[d].textContent;i%26%26(c=c+"\n"+i)}for(f=c,e=f.replace(/\n/g,"
"),g=e.split(" "),h=0;h"+g[h].substring(0,k)+""+g[h].substring(k,g[h].length)+" ","."==g[h].substring(g[h].length-1,g[h].length)%26%26(l+=" * "),m+=l;n.document.write(""+m+"

")})()}();

Re: An experiment to test if Bionic Reading helps you read faster

#13

Linked at the end of the article is the short (15 minutes maybe) self-test: https://speed.readwise.io/ . Curious what results people here got. I got 23% faster with BR but I couldn't tell if I was just trying harder.

23% faster with BR as well. 528 vs 419 WPM. Made a point about feeling comfortable while reading.

Re: An experiment to test if Bionic Reading helps you read faster

#14

Linked at the end of the article is the short (15 minutes maybe) self-test: https://speed.readwise.io/ . Curious what results people here got. I got 23% faster with BR but I couldn't tell if I was just trying harder.

I was a mere 2% faster. 404 vs 396 WPM.

Edit: 2% faster with BR.

Re: An experiment to test if Bionic Reading helps you read faster

#15
I notice that I no longer spend energy actively scanning lines with bionic reading - my eyes snap automatically. I'm able to look at the text "from a distance" and the words just enter my mind, and I did get 31% faster reading from bionics according to this test.

Re: An experiment to test if Bionic Reading helps you read faster

#16

Here are some bookmarklets I developed to cut out the extra formatting, bolding, and other content on websites that makes them difficult to read. I would appreciate any feedback or modifications for improvement. Literata font with a peach background color to optimize reading speed and no selective bolding: javascript:void function(){javascript:(function(){var a=Math.floor,b=document.querySelectorAll("p, title, a, ul"…

Probably a good idea to add `font-size: 0.5cm` in there or something.

Re: An experiment to test if Bionic Reading helps you read faster

#17
post #10

I find it really difficult and annoying -- and thereby slow -- to read with these "fixation" points as that's just not how I feel eyes work... I want my eyes to scan across the text rather than ratcheting from one word to the next word, which is both slow and exhausting. The words and "fixation" is thereby just a massive distraction. Hell: if I really really need to read quickly I try to do this thing where I scan my…

Personal anecdote. When I try to read fast, I notice fixation points as my eyes skip across the text. But it will be whole chunks of words. And anything that tries to draw my attention to one letter as opposed to another, will slow me down.

Note that my natural reading speed is ~950 wpm, so I tend to ignore these fads. I read fast enough already. The main barrier to reading faster is that it gets exhausting having my brain constantly trying to catch up to my eyes.

Re: An experiment to test if Bionic Reading helps you read faster

#18
I read once that when we read, our eyes bounce along the tops of the letters. A demonstration removed the lower parts of the letters, and interestingly, I was able to still read the words. I would like to see this same test but with a font that removed the lower half of the words in each sentence. Just for kicks and giggles...

Re: An experiment to test if Bionic Reading helps you read faster

#19
post #9

>you should notice a funny pattern: almost every person's fastest font was the font they received on the first article. Is it possible that people "calibrate" their brains towards a specific reading style, and that first style induces the calibration? Similar to how you can calibrate to quickly pick out a picture of a specific object, from a gallery of pictures, after you've prepared yourself to see that picture.

I'm guessing that the very next sentence was the actual reason:

>This is likely because the first article was less challenging to read

Re: An experiment to test if Bionic Reading helps you read faster

#20

Linked at the end of the article is the short (15 minutes maybe) self-test: https://speed.readwise.io/ . Curious what results people here got. I got 23% faster with BR but I couldn't tell if I was just trying harder.

we'll definitely make a follow up post once we've gathered enough data here! hopefully in a week or so :)

(my results were 2% faster with BR)

Post reply on HN