The "rationalist community" is morbidly fascinating in their tendency to be so self-important while also having a deficit of self-awareness. The author of this piece can't understand why an internet-famous blogger/Substack writer that he follows doesn't have time to drop everything and debate the minutia of a blog post he wrong last year on a topic that has long since been settled. Note that Scott did listen to him,…
Quoted post unavailable.
Scott Alexander's correction on ivermectin and its meaning for the rationalists
11–20 of 100 posts
Re: Scott Alexander's correction on ivermectin and its meaning for the rationalists
#12The "rationalist community" is morbidly fascinating in their tendency to be so self-important while also having a deficit of self-awareness. The author of this piece can't understand why an internet-famous blogger/Substack writer that he follows doesn't have time to drop everything and debate the minutia of a blog post he wrong last year on a topic that has long since been settled. Note that Scott did listen to him,…
Quoted post unavailable.
Re: Scott Alexander's correction on ivermectin and its meaning for the rationalists
#13I guess 'rationalism', as a name, calls a certain kind of person out of the ether: 1. They like rationality, and feel it's opposed by 'irrationality'. 2. They want to be part of some 'rational group'. 3. They're ignorant enough not to know the name is already taken. 4. They're ignorant enough not to know that the name means pretty much the opposite of what they believe. (A real rationalist, for instance, probably wou…
Re: Scott Alexander's correction on ivermectin and its meaning for the rationalists
#14Re: Scott Alexander's correction on ivermectin and its meaning for the rationalists
#15The "rationalist community" is morbidly fascinating in their tendency to be so self-important while also having a deficit of self-awareness. The author of this piece can't understand why an internet-famous blogger/Substack writer that he follows doesn't have time to drop everything and debate the minutia of a blog post he wrong last year on a topic that has long since been settled. Note that Scott did listen to him,…
...and then there is the rest of the community. They cargo-cult all the phrases and hobbies and opinions, but it's like when you wore that first suit: it wasn't yours, you didn't have the shoulders, and everyone but you knew it looked ridiculous. Seriously: even the other well-known people from that community (whose names I've since forgotten) are so obviously cosplaying the intellectualism. Even in the natural science I studied, I would not be able to identify the smart and the not-so-smart papers or professors with such ease.
Re: Scott Alexander's correction on ivermectin and its meaning for the rationalists
#16The "rationalist community" is morbidly fascinating in their tendency to be so self-important while also having a deficit of self-awareness. The author of this piece can't understand why an internet-famous blogger/Substack writer that he follows doesn't have time to drop everything and debate the minutia of a blog post he wrong last year on a topic that has long since been settled. Note that Scott did listen to him,…
I’m about to start calling them what they are: Sophists.
Re: Scott Alexander's correction on ivermectin and its meaning for the rationalists
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
I didn't read this and suddenly think "oh my god- the whole establishment is wrong! How thankful I am that some rational person has done the hard math for me to explain why ivermectin is a magic cure". The current medical opinion is that ivermectin only appears to have an effect when it's actually treating an underlying condition (parasitic infection). I don't see that changing any time soon; certainly nobody has sho…
Re: Scott Alexander's correction on ivermectin and its meaning for the rationalists
#18The "rationalist community" is morbidly fascinating in their tendency to be so self-important while also having a deficit of self-awareness. The author of this piece can't understand why an internet-famous blogger/Substack writer that he follows doesn't have time to drop everything and debate the minutia of a blog post he wrong last year on a topic that has long since been settled. Note that Scott did listen to him,…
Quoted post unavailable.
Re: Scott Alexander's correction on ivermectin and its meaning for the rationalists
#19Re: Scott Alexander's correction on ivermectin and its meaning for the rationalists
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
There is no evidence it is effective. The papers claiming to show its effectiveness are riddled with errors and have been retracted.