Live data from Hacker News

Why can't USA remove weapons from homes?

news.ycombinator.com

11–20 of 45 posts

Re: Why can't USA remove weapons from homes?

#11
post #9

I'll never support no weapon ownership, can't defend yourself against say the gov. On the other hand, Japan seems like a nice place. Edit: will clarify I'm not an ACAB supporter or anything like that.

Is this even an argument, or are you being sarcastic?

No post body was provided.

Re: Why can't USA remove weapons from homes?

#12
post #5

Why so much focus on the tools and not the problem? Crazy people will use whatever to harm others. Should we ban literally everything that could be harmful? Guns today, knives tomorrow, how about no more acid or cleaning supplies, then no more cars either since you can drive a truck through a crowd, right? I think addressing the underlying cause would be much more effective. A gun in a society full of healthy people…

> Why so much focus on the tools and not the problem?

What if the tool in question is _made_ for killing? If you think it's just as easy to kill a lot of people with a knife as with a gun, you're in for a surprise.

Re: Why can't USA remove weapons from homes?

#13
post #8
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> robust gun education made mandatory for everyone as part of their primary education. Nineteen children have received a particularly final form of gun education as part of their primary education yesterday.

Indeed they did, and it is horrible! The surviving ones are seriously impacted as well. I need to make an edit: Basic education on the way to adulthood. I did not intend to reference this current event. I just heard about it tonight.

However, nothing to be done, right?

I'm sure if Russian cruise missiles were dropping on American schools every few weeks, killing dozens of pupils, something would be done, and yet in this case everyone rushes to collaborate with the enemy and ensure they're armed.

Re: Why can't USA remove weapons from homes?

#14
post #13
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Indeed they did, and it is horrible! The surviving ones are seriously impacted as well. I need to make an edit: Basic education on the way to adulthood. I did not intend to reference this current event. I just heard about it tonight.

However, nothing to be done, right? I'm sure if Russian cruise missiles were dropping on American schools every few weeks, killing dozens of pupils, something would be done, and yet in this case everyone rushes to collaborate with the enemy and ensure they're armed.

Your words, not mine.

Re: Why can't USA remove weapons from homes?

#15
I live in the UK and very few people have guns, even the police are not routinely armed. Yet, we still have these kind of events from time to time.

You could ban guns today and they will still be around for the next few hundred years. It's natural to search for answers in times like these but sometimes there just aren't any.

Re: Why can't USA remove weapons from homes?

#16
post #15

I live in the UK and very few people have guns, even the police are not routinely armed. Yet, we still have these kind of events from time to time. You could ban guns today and they will still be around for the next few hundred years. It's natural to search for answers in times like these but sometimes there just aren't any.

Realistically: no, we don't. The one and only school shooting, Dunblane, was a catalyst for the UK gun ban, and that was in the 1990s. There have been a few terrorist attacks carried out with bathtub-made explosives, some truck and knife terrorism, and a few shootings a year carried out mostly by organised crime.

The US shooting epidemic is far more deadly than the Troubles was, an actual paramilitary civil war.

The US has spent far more effort trying to ban abortion than to deal with school shootings.

Re: Why can't USA remove weapons from homes?

#17
post #7
post #4

"What the people wish for" You imply the wish is for there to be no guns. The hard fact is that simply is not true. Americans have a wide range of opinion on the matter ranging from no guns, through various scenarios where there are guns and various ownership scenarios and regulations, and through to gun ownership being basically unfettered. Sidebar: The US currently is not a fully Democratic nation! It is a Republic…

> robust gun education made mandatory for everyone as part of their primary education. Nineteen children have received a particularly final form of gun education as part of their primary education yesterday.

[dead]

Re: Why can't USA remove weapons from homes?

#18
post #5

Why so much focus on the tools and not the problem? Crazy people will use whatever to harm others. Should we ban literally everything that could be harmful? Guns today, knives tomorrow, how about no more acid or cleaning supplies, then no more cars either since you can drive a truck through a crowd, right? I think addressing the underlying cause would be much more effective. A gun in a society full of healthy people…

>Why so much focus on the tools and not the problem?

Because the tools are part of the problem. Tools aren't neutral, availability influences use, policy influences mentality, and so on.

Re: Why can't USA remove weapons from homes?

#19
post #18
post #5

Why so much focus on the tools and not the problem? Crazy people will use whatever to harm others. Should we ban literally everything that could be harmful? Guns today, knives tomorrow, how about no more acid or cleaning supplies, then no more cars either since you can drive a truck through a crowd, right? I think addressing the underlying cause would be much more effective. A gun in a society full of healthy people…

> Why so much focus on the tools and not the problem? Because the tools are part of the problem. Tools aren't neutral, availability influences use, policy influences mentality, and so on.

Fully agreed.

After the modern crane technology was invented there are exponential increased in the number of high rise buildings including the skyscappers.

Post reply on HN