Napkin math: earth's surface area is ~510 million square kilometers. The lander is described as fitting in a 1-meter protective shell. So we have a roughly 1 in 510 billion chance of standing in the lucky spot. (This of course would only be accurate if all square meters of the earth's surface were equally likely to be hit. Not the case since the lander appears to be orbiting the equator.)
Kosmos 482: questions around a failed 1972 Venera lander still orbiting Earth
11–20 of 75 posts
Re: Kosmos 482: questions around a failed 1972 Venera lander still orbiting Earth
#12tl;dr on why its relevant: „The reentry of the Kosmos 482 Descent Craft will not be your standard reentry. The Descent Craft was designed to survive entry through the dense atmosphere of Venus. It will therefore likely survive reentry into the Earth’s atmosphere intact and make a crash landing (it is extremely unlikely that the parachute system will still work after more than 50 years in space). This will therefore b…
Re: Kosmos 482: questions around a failed 1972 Venera lander still orbiting Earth
#13While the odds are low of any space debris hitting land, it was the photo in this article that surprised me - I was thinking billiard ball size debris, not this - http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/4542804/Government-report-o...
Re: Kosmos 482: questions around a failed 1972 Venera lander still orbiting Earth
#14An interesting note right at the end, so in case anyone missed it: this same launch is believed to be the source of 5 titanium "spaceballs" that fell onto New Zealand in 1972. While the odds are low of any space debris hitting land, it was the photo in this article that surprised me - I was thinking billiard ball size debris, not this - http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/4542804/Government-report-o...
Re: Kosmos 482: questions around a failed 1972 Venera lander still orbiting Earth
#15An interesting note right at the end, so in case anyone missed it: this same launch is believed to be the source of 5 titanium "spaceballs" that fell onto New Zealand in 1972. While the odds are low of any space debris hitting land, it was the photo in this article that surprised me - I was thinking billiard ball size debris, not this - http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/4542804/Government-report-o...
That article mentions them dangling a wrist watch over the space ball to see if it was radioactive. How would this work?
Re: Kosmos 482: questions around a failed 1972 Venera lander still orbiting Earth
#16tl;dr on why its relevant: „The reentry of the Kosmos 482 Descent Craft will not be your standard reentry. The Descent Craft was designed to survive entry through the dense atmosphere of Venus. It will therefore likely survive reentry into the Earth’s atmosphere intact and make a crash landing (it is extremely unlikely that the parachute system will still work after more than 50 years in space). This will therefore b…
Would we be able to shoot it down before it hits anything?
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-will-not-conduct-direct-...
Re: Kosmos 482: questions around a failed 1972 Venera lander still orbiting Earth
#17Re: Kosmos 482: questions around a failed 1972 Venera lander still orbiting Earth
#18If a chunk of Soviet space junk falls on someone's house, does the Russian Federation just shrug and say, "That was the USSR, bruh, sorry." They must have assumed responsibility for the Soviet space program, right? It's sort of like firing a bullet into the air... Doesn't matter how long it takes to come down, it's still your fault if it kills someone.
Re: Kosmos 482: questions around a failed 1972 Venera lander still orbiting Earth
#19Did anyone get when the ETA is for impact and predicted location?
Re: Kosmos 482: questions around a failed 1972 Venera lander still orbiting Earth
#20Napkin math: earth's surface area is ~510 million square kilometers. The lander is described as fitting in a 1-meter protective shell. So we have a roughly 1 in 510 billion chance of standing in the lucky spot. (This of course would only be accurate if all square meters of the earth's surface were equally likely to be hit. Not the case since the lander appears to be orbiting the equator.)