Earlier quoted context omitted.
See for example : https://docs.synthetix.io/synopsis Basically you mint only a fraction of your collateral (typically 15%), so even a huge downturn of the price won't leave anybody hanging, and you provide a set of incentives for the owners of the collateral to adjust their staking depending on the price you are trying to follow. It's not too complex, and seems to me way better than trusting tether and Co.
Ok, so fundamentally it's heavily discounting the collateral. I guess that makes it safer, but doesn't that mean you need way more collateral to support it and therefore you're paying a really high cost of capital? I can support $1Bn of stablecoin if I have $1Bn of USD in reserve, but to support $1Bn of stablecoin in this case I'd need $6.7Bn of BTC in reserve. Sounds expensive surely?
If the BTC price collapses the people who bought your leveraged coin get wiped out, and effectively pay off the bottom guys.
This is why leveraged Bitcoin pawn-style loans are all over the place.