Earlier quoted context omitted.
> run it fully decentralized. and yet, such a thing is already possible - in fact there's plenty of choices. None of them have taken off for various reasons. I really don't believe a decentralized system works as the network effect fails to achieve domination under such a system (aka, competition from centralized network will out-compete it).
I don't mean decentralized as in run by small communities. I mean decentralized as in not run in anyone's server... like how Dapps run on Etherium.
I love Twitter. Twitter is the closest thing we have to a global consciousness
11–14 of 14 posts
Re: I love Twitter. Twitter is the closest thing we have to a global consciousness
#12If Twitter is the closest thing to a global consciousness we are all doomed as a species. How can someone even claim this? Twitter is a cesspool, I thought people on Twitter knew this. But apparently not. That being said, it is @jack who is saying this. So I'd take it with a massive tablespoon of salt.
the instinctual component of personality that is present at birth, and is the source of bodily needs and wants, emotional impulses and desires, especially aggression and the libido (sex drive).
It doesn't have even a shadow of "superego" to put in charge of moderating its wants and desires. It's an infant -- an infant that is never going to grow up.
If it's a "global consciousness", then it's a consciousness of an entity I do not wish to ever meet. It's a terrible person, and it's only getting worse.
Re: I love Twitter. Twitter is the closest thing we have to a global consciousness
#13If Twitter is the closest thing to a global consciousness we are all doomed as a species. How can someone even claim this? Twitter is a cesspool, I thought people on Twitter knew this. But apparently not. That being said, it is @jack who is saying this. So I'd take it with a massive tablespoon of salt.
Re: I love Twitter. Twitter is the closest thing we have to a global consciousness
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
> run it fully decentralized. and yet, such a thing is already possible - in fact there's plenty of choices. None of them have taken off for various reasons. I really don't believe a decentralized system works as the network effect fails to achieve domination under such a system (aka, competition from centralized network will out-compete it).
I don't mean decentralized as in run by small communities. I mean decentralized as in not run in anyone's server... like how Dapps run on Etherium.