Slack’s Incident on 2-22-22
11–20 of 183 posts
Re: Slack’s Incident on 2-22-22
#12Re: Slack’s Incident on 2-22-22
#13McRib is a hilarious name for a service
I certainly wouldn't trust it's availability. (The original McDonald's McRib sandwich is well known for only being sold a limited time.) So "Mcrouter" comes from Memcache-Router, then the obvious McDonalds jokes are made and someone cleverly suggests "Mcrib" for the next service. But I can't think what the backronym would be for it. Memcache Ring Buffer maybe. Or Broker.
Re: Slack’s Incident on 2-22-22
#14McRib is a hilarious name for a service
I certainly wouldn't trust it's availability. (The original McDonald's McRib sandwich is well known for only being sold a limited time.) So "Mcrouter" comes from Memcache-Router, then the obvious McDonalds jokes are made and someone cleverly suggests "Mcrib" for the next service. But I can't think what the backronym would be for it. Memcache Ring Buffer maybe. Or Broker.
Re: Slack’s Incident on 2-22-22
#15As if no other way to communicate exists?
I remember using Slack, feeling fed up with emails, until I realized that if I wanted to sync Slack messages offline and have a standard way to view these messages that I was SOL. I am so glad that I've returned to email and optimized my workflow to use email effectively and efficiently. The best part is no more vendor lock-in.
Re: Slack’s Incident on 2-22-22
#16Re: Slack’s Incident on 2-22-22
#17A Date that is both a Palindrome and an Ambigram: https://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/22-02-2022-is-b...
Re: Slack’s Incident on 2-22-22
#18That date format is actually the worst I have ever encountered. m-d-y, with year in 2 digits, numbers not zero-padded, US "order" yet using dashes. It's like a moderator of /r/ISO8601 came up with the worst possible format on purpose . Am I missing something?
Re: Slack’s Incident on 2-22-22
#19That date format is actually the worst I have ever encountered. m-d-y, with year in 2 digits, numbers not zero-padded, US "order" yet using dashes. It's like a moderator of /r/ISO8601 came up with the worst possible format on purpose . Am I missing something?
Re: Slack’s Incident on 2-22-22
#20*22/2/22