Live data from Hacker News

AWS Aurora Serverless V2

aws.amazon.com

11–15 of 15 posts

Re: AWS Aurora Serverless V2

#11
post #7

Does anyone know if Aurora PostgreSQL is a full drop-in replacement for Postgres, or is it "Postgres compatible" but missing some features (like CockroachDB, for example)? I am very interested in this service but some of my projects depend on Postgres-specific features.

Fully Postgres compatible in my experience. As long as you don’t require extensions that AWS doesn’t support. But I believe AWS has the widest array of extensions for Postgres of any cloud provider.

Re: AWS Aurora Serverless V2

#14
Great work Amazon Web Services (AWS)! I am already waiting for V3.... Wish list:

- Pay per transaction (Reads, Writes) + Storage, instead of per resource allocation (some competitors are offering this already).

- No need for VPC, just like DynamoDB does today.

- Multi-region sync replication (no data loss in case a region goes down), but on a per-table base.

- Self-tuning capabilities, like ottertune and postgres.ai

- Unlimited Fast Database Cloning copies for non-production environments (COW)

- Transparent connection pooler (useful when using Lambda)

Re: AWS Aurora Serverless V2

#15
So, I moved one of our Postgres DBs to Aurora Serverless V2 (for testing). First the process is super ridiculous. Anyways I am quite disappointed. One of the main reasons was their "scaling to 0" for some DBs we get close to none and then really spiky traffic. But they removed that! So, that leaves you with .5 ACUs running no matter what. But that is not great! Its 0.07 per hour, a t3.micro is 0.02 an hour. I was looking for a DB that could scale to 0 cost and then ramp up to handle > 10k requests per seconds.
Post reply on HN