Live data from Hacker News

Democracy at Work Is Bad

news.ycombinator.com

11–12 of 12 posts

Re: Democracy at Work Is Bad

#11
BTW in federal structures exists thing named consensus, and in democracy also used many systems different from simple rule 1 person = 1 vote - quorum, quotes.

Consensus, mean, two things: 1. Things differentiated by level of abstraction - less abstract usually subordinated to lower level. For example, question who will wash windows usually on lowest levels of organization, and for this corresponding department got budget, access grants and resources. 2. Things of highest level of abstraction only accepted if nobody vote against them (in large organizations counter-vote may require more than one vote, for example in joint-stock companies usual rule, for veto need 10%+1 votes).

Re: Democracy at Work Is Bad

#12
post #9
post #7

This approach doesn't have any relationship to democracy that I can see. It is very common to delegate organizational work. But it only works if the manager exercises their competence to check and guide the work.

Related to democracy, because the decisions are delegated to team vote, even though team is not experts in making those decisions.

The team voted, but they don't have real authority here. Could they vote to not make the decision? Could they vote to depose the manager and replace them with another teammate?

Your real problem is that the manager might be incompetent.

Post reply on HN