> "post" was a different word for "mail", this is clear > and "fix" was for Sendmail this is unclear. I don't know how you get "fix" from "Sendmail"
Sendmail was the problem, Postfix was the fix.
Why Postfix is called Postfix and IBM secure mailer
11–20 of 25 posts
Re: Why Postfix is called Postfix and IBM secure mailer
#12> "post" was a different word for "mail", this is clear > and "fix" was for Sendmail this is unclear. I don't know how you get "fix" from "Sendmail"
Sendmail was the problem, Postfix was the fix.
Ah nice, so it's more like:
> "post" was a different word for "mail", and [the application was itself a] "fix" ... for Sendmail
Re: Why Postfix is called Postfix and IBM secure mailer
#13It wasn't originally called Postfix; it was VMailer.
Re: Why Postfix is called Postfix and IBM secure mailer
#14How many greybeards here remember the O'reilly Sendmail bat book[1]? I built an ISP off of deciphering cryptic sendmail.cf parameters from it. This is what the "fix" in Postfix aims to "fix". (Although the Postfix config files are no walk in the park either.) [1] https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/sendmail-4th-edition/97...
But you don’t need to know cryptic sendmail.cf parameters, you can just use m4 macros which are totally not cryptic at all.
You can now. That was not always the cas e, and that is one of many reasons I used postfix instead of sendmail back in the day.
Re: Why Postfix is called Postfix and IBM secure mailer
#15Postfix is good software, but I do not miss managing email servers.
As a hobby mail everything is fun (from MUAs to sieve). If it needs to be reliable it's not. Don't miss self-hosting my email service either ("has the response to my application arrived or did I fail to receive it").
Re: Why Postfix is called Postfix and IBM secure mailer
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
But you don’t need to know cryptic sendmail.cf parameters, you can just use m4 macros which are totally not cryptic at all.
For the benefit of those fortunate enough to have never had to configure that beast, you can find any number of terrifying examples. Here's one: https://tldp.org/LDP/nag2/x14661.html#X-087-2-SENDMAIL.MC.UU... From that, we see LOCAL_NET_CONFIG # This rule ensures that all local mail is delivered using the # smtp transport, everything else will go via the smart host. R$* $* $#smtp $@ $2.$m. $: $1 $3 dnl Clear as day,…
it's been a few decades that i had to deal with sendmail (i have a vage memory of having read the whole book on it, though i could be wrong because i also remember joking that i was waiting for the movie instead of reading the book)
anyways, after staring at this for a few minutes and without looking up any syntax, a few things became noticeable:
R$* $* is matching a pattern, with each $* being assigned to $1, $2 and $3 respectively.
$m must contain the local domain. so effectively this pattern matches any mail addressed to a host with the local domain.
$#smtp if that pattern matches, use smtp,
$@ $2.$m. by connecting to $2.$m. (which means, just use the host that was specified in the original mail)
$: $1 $3 (not sure what this part does. my guess is: rewrite the email address as specified here, that is in this case don't rewrite it at all.)
it's terse, but regular expressions are worse than this particular example.
now i need to go look up the syntax to see how much i actually got right.
for example i have no idea what the $3 parameter is for. i am guessing $1 is the part before the @ in an email. $3 could be the From address or have something to do with alternate addressing schemes
Re: Why Postfix is called Postfix and IBM secure mailer
#17ah the good old days, when a bunch of MTA was coming out (exim, vmail, qmail and postfix) to replace sendmail cf and m4 atrocities.
It's interesting to see that the most popular who came out as "winner" has been postfix,
altho these days most people would setup a relay with msmtp going to a closed source provider than full fledged postfix/cyrus service
Re: Why Postfix is called Postfix and IBM secure mailer
#18How many greybeards here remember the O'reilly Sendmail bat book[1]? I built an ISP off of deciphering cryptic sendmail.cf parameters from it. This is what the "fix" in Postfix aims to "fix". (Although the Postfix config files are no walk in the park either.) [1] https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/sendmail-4th-edition/97...
But you don’t need to know cryptic sendmail.cf parameters, you can just use m4 macros which are totally not cryptic at all.
Poe's Law in full effect.
Re: Why Postfix is called Postfix and IBM secure mailer
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
For the benefit of those fortunate enough to have never had to configure that beast, you can find any number of terrifying examples. Here's one: https://tldp.org/LDP/nag2/x14661.html#X-087-2-SENDMAIL.MC.UU... From that, we see LOCAL_NET_CONFIG # This rule ensures that all local mail is delivered using the # smtp transport, everything else will go via the smart host. R$* $* $#smtp $@ $2.$m. $: $1 $3 dnl Clear as day,…
it's been a few decades that i had to deal with sendmail (i have a vage memory of having read the whole book on it, though i could be wrong because i also remember joking that i was waiting for the movie instead of reading the book) anyways, after staring at this for a few minutes and without looking up any syntax, a few things became noticeable: R$* $* is matching a pattern, with each $* being assigned to $1, $2 and…
There were lots of people who could read this for a living. I was more or less able to at one point. Wow, I'm glad that I don't have to anymore, though, in much the same way I'm glad I never had to learn TECO.
Re: Why Postfix is called Postfix and IBM secure mailer
#20How many greybeards here remember the O'reilly Sendmail bat book[1]? I built an ISP off of deciphering cryptic sendmail.cf parameters from it. This is what the "fix" in Postfix aims to "fix". (Although the Postfix config files are no walk in the park either.) [1] https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/sendmail-4th-edition/97...
You made an ISP, this guy made Turtle Race[1]. What was that about Postfix being complex? ;)
1. https://www.linusakesson.net/programming/sendmail/index.php