Live data from Hacker News

Why Jobs is no Edison

american.com

11–20 of 20 posts

Re: Why Jobs is no Edison

#11

This is a response to another article that made the comparison. Given that neither Apple nor Jobs have suggested Jobs is an Edison, and given that I haven’t heard anyone calling Jobs an Edison outside of the article this author cites, I’d call this “Feeding a troll.” Sure, one person called Jobs an Edison, but it doesn’t feel particularly worthy of a reply, much less of a spot on the HN front page.

[deleted]

Re: Why Jobs is no Edison

#12
post #11

This is a response to another article that made the comparison. Given that neither Apple nor Jobs have suggested Jobs is an Edison, and given that I haven’t heard anyone calling Jobs an Edison outside of the article this author cites, I’d call this “Feeding a troll.” Sure, one person called Jobs an Edison, but it doesn’t feel particularly worthy of a reply, much less of a spot on the HN front page.

[deleted]

I was not aware that potential professors are carefully screened for troll-like qualities before being given the position.

Re: Why Jobs is no Edison

#14
post #5

That's right, Steve's no Edison. Steve's better than Edison.

is this a joke? apple used to be cool. today apple is lame. it's unix made stupid. with a gui. jobs is a marketer. true colors. he could not code his way out of a wet paper bag. the people who deserve the credit are the design team. for designing stuff that looks good. from the icons going back to the late 80's, to the hardware casing which just keeps looking better. too bad they're wasting their talents working for a company that cannot innovate in software (no, gui's do not count). if unix is to be improved, it will not happen at apple. and they will do everything in their power to prevent you from running a better os on their hw.

Re: Why Jobs is no Edison

#18
post #3

More like, Why Jobs is no Tesla, Edison took credit for the work of others.

But Jobs took credit for the work of others(Wozniak) too.

No he did not. He always talked about "we at apple", and always gave credit to the engineering and designer teams.

The story of Wozniak and Jobs is widely known, Jobs described Wozniak on more than one occasion as a brilliant engineer and that without him, Apple would not have existed.

Re: Why Jobs is no Edison

#19
Steve Jobs became big by being right most of the time. Edison became big by being a bully with questionable business practices. DC vs AC anyone?

If there is one person you could compare Jobs to, this would be Henri Ford, who's vision also combined existing technologies into something new, brilliant, making something simpler, more useful and more accessible for the large public.

Re: Why Jobs is no Edison

#20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But Jobs took credit for the work of others(Wozniak) too.

No he did not. He always talked about "we at apple", and always gave credit to the engineering and designer teams. The story of Wozniak and Jobs is widely known, Jobs described Wozniak on more than one occasion as a brilliant engineer and that without him, Apple would not have existed.

To clarify, I was agreeing that Tesla was beyond them all. :)

The area where Jobs has done what no one else has -- made technology into art we love to buy, use and enjoy, and opened the world up to connecting, sharing and creating, is in the same spirit of what Tesla brought into the world with his innovations with electricity.

I think we can agree that Electricity is a little more fundamental to day-to-day raising the quality of more people's lives in this world than a phone, computer, or ipad. It might be less and less each day, but I still think electricity can transform everyone's life.

Post reply on HN