Live data from Hacker News

An empirical investigation of personalization factors on TikTok

arxiv.org

11–20 of 36 posts

Re: An empirical investigation of personalization factors on TikTok

#11

I don't understand how it works for people. I tried for what felt an eternity, and it kept showing me terrible content. So I removed it. Is there something that is not made to turn your brain into a sponge on tik tok ?

Your experience, while worth noting, is clearly atypical.

Re: An empirical investigation of personalization factors on TikTok

#13

I don't understand how it works for people. I tried for what felt an eternity, and it kept showing me terrible content. So I removed it. Is there something that is not made to turn your brain into a sponge on tik tok ?

Your experience, while worth noting, is clearly atypical.

I understand that I probably have a niche taste, been a nerd and all, but still.

Maybe I'm not the target?

Do they have a lot of millennial users or is it mostly for the younger generation?

Re: An empirical investigation of personalization factors on TikTok

#14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your experience, while worth noting, is clearly atypical.

I understand that I probably have a niche taste, been a nerd and all, but still. Maybe I'm not the target? Do they have a lot of millennial users or is it mostly for the younger generation?

I think it's just broken in some cases for whatever reason. Like 9 months ago I mentioned trying out Tik Tok for some weeks and despite lots of "not interested", likes etc, I got swamped by 99% garbage, including videos I specifically said I don't want to see.

Re: An empirical investigation of personalization factors on TikTok

#15

I don't understand how it works for people. I tried for what felt an eternity, and it kept showing me terrible content. So I removed it. Is there something that is not made to turn your brain into a sponge on tik tok ?

My experience exactly, and my friend's experience too. I'm inclined to think every "tiktok is soo great after you put time into it" comment I see is some form of Stockholm syndrome..

Re: An empirical investigation of personalization factors on TikTok

#16

I wonder if the recommendation engines are different per country. For example in the US, you usually can't be recommended videos from accounts outside the US. Even with a VPN, spoofed geo location, system language, added video language you will be served only mostly videos based on your IMEI.

I think it's not the IMEI as on my imported phone I would see mostly local content. (and very bad content at that.. uninstalled after a while and never looked back)

Re: An empirical investigation of personalization factors on TikTok

#17

For the longest time I didn't download it cause of its reputation. It's pretty good, no cruft of YouTube. 'youre watching this, that.. like subscribe.. word from of sponsers' none of that nonsense - pure content. Both FB and YouTube are copying the features button for button. IMO, Not bad

I haven't managed to find non-meme content on tiktok.. But I found that SponsorBlock and uBlock make youtube bearable

Re: An empirical investigation of personalization factors on TikTok

#18

I wonder if the recommendation engines are different per country. For example in the US, you usually can't be recommended videos from accounts outside the US. Even with a VPN, spoofed geo location, system language, added video language you will be served only mostly videos based on your IMEI.

That's odd. I get recommended Japanese content despite living in Canada. Much of this content is welcome too.

Re: An empirical investigation of personalization factors on TikTok

#19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your experience, while worth noting, is clearly atypical.

I understand that I probably have a niche taste, been a nerd and all, but still. Maybe I'm not the target? Do they have a lot of millennial users or is it mostly for the younger generation?

TikTok has lots of content for nerds (though I think they prefer the term neurodivergent). But there is certainly a trend that TikTok content is comparatively shallow. For example Hank [1] and John Green [2] have quite nerdy content, but it's much shorter less developed thoughts than their youtube channel [3]. Or NileRed: his most recent TikTok[4] (eating capsaicin) is in no way comparable to his most recent YouTube[5] (synthesizing cotton candy from cotton balls). In terms of nerdy content it probably shines more with life advice than with science facts, simply because of the short video format.

Not sure about the age group, most of TikTok is probably targeted at ages 12-40.

1: https://www.tiktok.com/@hankgreen1?lang=en

2: https://www.tiktok.com/@literallyjohngreen?lang=en

3: https://www.youtube.com/c/vlogbrothers

4: https://www.tiktok.com/@nilered/video/7063145462794145030

5: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHuFizITMdA

Re: An empirical investigation of personalization factors on TikTok

#20
post #9
post #4

> Through this approach we were able to test and analyse the affect of the language and location used to access TikTok, follow- and like feature, as well as how the recommended content changes as a user watches certain posts longer than others. Our results revealed that all tested factors have an effect on the way TikTok’s RS recommends content to its users. We have also shown that the follow-feature influences the r…

Shorter duration videos = more samples to train the recommender.

You also have clear negative examples for the recommender, because not watching something is an active choice (you have to swipe away).
Post reply on HN