The Goat Boy Rises (1993)
11–20 of 60 posts
Re: The Goat Boy Rises (1993)
#12Re: The Goat Boy Rises (1993)
#13Quoted post unavailable.
Like you're doing now, I suppose. One hopes you find your perspective of today judged in 2050 with more charity than you bother showing here.
Re: The Goat Boy Rises (1993)
#14Quoted post unavailable.
Re: The Goat Boy Rises (1993)
#15Quoted post unavailable.
Re: The Goat Boy Rises (1993)
#16Sometimes I find these kinds of link submissions pretty baffling. "Here's a nearly 30 year old article about a dead comedian!" Thanks, I guess. But also: why? Why this arbitrary New Yorker article, as opposed to any other article written in the last three decades?
You can find a lot of his stuff, full shows as well as excerpts, on YouTube, and I'd recommend doing so. You'll find your question better answered there than here.
Re: The Goat Boy Rises (1993)
#17Quoted post unavailable.
Re: The Goat Boy Rises (1993)
#18Quoted post unavailable.
Re: The Goat Boy Rises (1993)
#19Quoted post unavailable.
I'd say 30 years later his material is a little more obvious but being 30 years ahead of the curve is a pretty nice compliment. In my State pot is now legal, some psychedelics are decriminalized (and small amounts of any illegal drug is no longer a felony), and my partner does intense therapy on MDMA (via legal trials). We may not be living with Bill Hicks presently, but we live more in Bill Hicks's hopeful future than ever before.
There are lots of 90's comics that are now pretty irrelevant, but Hicks ain't one of them. He wasn't trying to be universally loved, which may be what you're hitting against. He also wasn't positioning himself out as some super intellectual. He self-identified as being simply a, "dark poet". Being a comic was - and is, a pretty tough gig.
Re: The Goat Boy Rises (1993)
#20Note what qualified as "censorship" to The New Yorker in the 90s.