Florida governor to investigate GoFundMe over Canada trucker donations
11–20 of 731 posts
Re: Florida governor to investigate GoFundMe over Canada trucker donations
#12Quoted post unavailable.
Re: Florida governor to investigate GoFundMe over Canada trucker donations
#13Quoted post unavailable.
Re: Florida governor to investigate GoFundMe over Canada trucker donations
#14Is this essentially going to be an investigation in which they find that which has made people butthurt is something they signed away in the terms & conditions they never read? Seems like it. Good on GoFundMe.
Re: Florida governor to investigate GoFundMe over Canada trucker donations
#15Re: Florida governor to investigate GoFundMe over Canada trucker donations
#16Quoted post unavailable.
Re: Florida governor to investigate GoFundMe over Canada trucker donations
#17Quoted post unavailable.
Your attempted explanation is wrong. Trump won the rust belt in 2016 because neoliberals sold out the working class and their unions. This behavior by the administration is a half hearted attempt to roll some of that back.
Re: Florida governor to investigate GoFundMe over Canada trucker donations
#18Quoted post unavailable.
Your attempted explanation is wrong. Trump won the rust belt in 2016 because neoliberals sold out the working class and their unions. This behavior by the administration is a half hearted attempt to roll some of that back.
Re: Florida governor to investigate GoFundMe over Canada trucker donations
#19Is this essentially going to be an investigation in which they find that which has made people butthurt is something they signed away in the terms & conditions they never read? Seems like it. Good on GoFundMe.
Alternatively, make the 15,000 tiny letters illegal, and require products to specify in clear, easily understandable language what the user is agreeing to; with the ability to return whatever it is if they do not agree with it.
Re: Florida governor to investigate GoFundMe over Canada trucker donations
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your attempted explanation is wrong. Trump won the rust belt in 2016 because neoliberals sold out the working class and their unions. This behavior by the administration is a half hearted attempt to roll some of that back.
Using a political office to effect political change is against the law. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatch_Act
From your linked article:
>using this language to specify those who are exempt:[10]
> (i) an employee paid from an appropriation for the Executive Office of the President; or
> (ii) an employee appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, whose position is located within the United States, who determines policies to be pursued by the United States in the nationwide administration of Federal laws.
I'm sure that "the administration" that evv555 was talking about involves either of those people, instead of some random civil servant.