Google+ Opens to All
11–20 of 182 posts
Re: Google+ Opens to All
#12...almost everyone. "Google+ is not yet available for Google Apps. Learn More." I should have known better than to get my hopes up...
Re: Google+ Opens to All
#13...almost everyone. "Google+ is not yet available for Google Apps. Learn More." I should have known better than to get my hopes up...
Re: Google+ Opens to All
#14Edit: according to this, you're not even logging in to the same service. http://www.google.com/support/accounts/bin/static.py?page=gu... That's... not optimal.
Re: Google+ Opens to All
#15Time to see whether it will fly or the slowdown was a sign of trouble.
I've always found that multiple people editing a document was a killer feature. And with hangouts that seems to make it even better.
Re: Google+ Opens to All
#16Except for Google Apps users
Could you please explain what this means? The blog post says that anyone can join the project.
Because Google Apps is largely targeted at business/enterprise customers, it takes a while for some new updates and products to make their way into it; presumably the lag time is so that the the paid product can be kept as stable as possible.
Re: Google+ Opens to All
#17Re: Google+ Opens to All
#181: http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2011/08/04/real-na...
Re: Google+ Opens to All
#19Facebook is already copying the features that make G+ cool/useful (circles, etc), and the one big, inherent advantage you had in your favor (Your user base, e.g every Google account) you alienated by keeping it "invite only" for too long.
Either open it to everyone sooner, or hold off on this prolonged "invite period" so you don't risk confusing / alienating people that want to try G+ but can't.
G+ feels like its the same 10 guys posting the same thing over and over, while Facebook feels like, well.. Facebook.
Re: Google+ Opens to All
#20Why is everyone complaining about Apps accounts not being able to sign up? It says right on the "features" page http://www.google.com/apps/intl/en/business/features.html "99.9% uptime SLA" which means that if they add a service with less than 99.9% uptime, they're going to lose money. They haven't even finished writing Google+ for normal users, there's no way they can make promises about support yet. Edit: according…