11–14 of 14 posts
Why does a Twitter alternative need blockchain?
Meanwhile, the Mastodon Project has made everyone fully aware of how they feel about blockchains: https://twitter.com/search?q=from%3Ajoinmastodon%20blockchai... one quote: "The blockchain's two core properties, immutability and centrality (i.e. the ledger is distributed, but everyone's got the same one), are actually pretty bad for a social network. People can put awful stuff into the blockchain - doxx, harassment,…
Meanwhile, the Mastodon Project has made everyone fully aware of how they feel about blockchains: https://twitter.com/search?q=from%3Ajoinmastodon%20blockchai... one quote: "The blockchain's two core properties, immutability and centrality (i.e. the ledger is distributed, but everyone's got the same one), are actually pretty bad for a social network. People can put awful stuff into the blockchain - doxx, harassment,…
Blockchain is database. Website or product who use it can control and filter out what data to show. It can be on chain, but social network dont have to show it.
We have ~ 5M identities in the existing federated social web, and it is interoperable, ethical, and standards driven. Get onboard or get left behind.
> "We don't sell your data and never will." Because your data is now freely available on the blockchain, forever.
Encrypted, you control who access this data