Vim Cheat Sheet - For Programmers By Programmers
11–20 of 64 posts
Re: Vim Cheat Sheet - For Programmers By Programmers
#12I started out vim, with bare minimum commands but later on went to emacs. With emacs I have an option M-x tab auto complete In case I don't get to remember something. I would like to know what are vim equivalents of this? Some how I feel deep down inside that vim was not designed bottom for this kind of complexity. I mean to say when you want to design something to scale you have to clearly decide what goes into the…
For what it's worth I feel how you feel about vim, about emacs. I suspect it's just a matter of familiarity.
edit: As DrJ points out, control-n works too. Seems the 'p' is for previous keyword and the 'n' for next keyword.
Re: Vim Cheat Sheet - For Programmers By Programmers
#13Now that's some visual clutter :(
There's simply no reason to think VIM is complicated or hard to learn at all :) There's a better looking but less information dense cheatsheet here. http://www.viemu.com/a_vi_vim_graphical_cheat_sheet_tutorial... I have it printed and taped to the window in the office.
Re: Vim Cheat Sheet - For Programmers By Programmers
#14Re: Vim Cheat Sheet - For Programmers By Programmers
#15I started out vim, with bare minimum commands but later on went to emacs. With emacs I have an option M-x tab auto complete In case I don't get to remember something. I would like to know what are vim equivalents of this? Some how I feel deep down inside that vim was not designed bottom for this kind of complexity. I mean to say when you want to design something to scale you have to clearly decide what goes into the…
In emacs, for word auto completion M-/ is just too awesome.
Re: Vim Cheat Sheet - For Programmers By Programmers
#16The sheet itself is really messy. I'd appreciate if anyone know a sheet that separates typical-editing and advanced-usage.
Re: Vim Cheat Sheet - For Programmers By Programmers
#17Why the need to stress For Programmers by Programmers? Isn't it obvious? The sheet itself is really messy. I'd appreciate if anyone know a sheet that separates typical-editing and advanced-usage.
Re: Vim Cheat Sheet - For Programmers By Programmers
#18I started out vim, with bare minimum commands but later on went to emacs. With emacs I have an option M-x tab auto complete In case I don't get to remember something. I would like to know what are vim equivalents of this? Some how I feel deep down inside that vim was not designed bottom for this kind of complexity. I mean to say when you want to design something to scale you have to clearly decide what goes into the…
"wollw" and "DrJ" I am talking about command auto completion, not word auto completion inside the editor. In emacs, for word auto completion M-/ is just too awesome.
Re: Vim Cheat Sheet - For Programmers By Programmers
#19I started out vim, with bare minimum commands but later on went to emacs. With emacs I have an option M-x tab auto complete In case I don't get to remember something. I would like to know what are vim equivalents of this? Some how I feel deep down inside that vim was not designed bottom for this kind of complexity. I mean to say when you want to design something to scale you have to clearly decide what goes into the…
"wollw" and "DrJ" I am talking about command auto completion, not word auto completion inside the editor. In emacs, for word auto completion M-/ is just too awesome.
Re: Vim Cheat Sheet - For Programmers By Programmers
#20I started out vim, with bare minimum commands but later on went to emacs. With emacs I have an option M-x tab auto complete In case I don't get to remember something. I would like to know what are vim equivalents of this? Some how I feel deep down inside that vim was not designed bottom for this kind of complexity. I mean to say when you want to design something to scale you have to clearly decide what goes into the…
"wollw" and "DrJ" I am talking about command auto completion, not word auto completion inside the editor. In emacs, for word auto completion M-/ is just too awesome.
For example, :colo completes to :colorscheme.