Probably because they're often used for spam? (I bought em because they were cheap.)
The Problem with Vanity TLDs (2011)
11–20 of 71 posts
Re: The Problem with Vanity TLDs (2011)
#12Needs (2011): http://web.archive.org/web/20110321001950/https://www.temple...
It might even be older according to the main page ("mostly written in 2001")[0]. Sure would be helpful if the author included a publish date. Many blog entries (and stack overflow type solutions) need time context (it may have been the solution/a reasonable position at the time ) https://www.templetons.com/brad/dns/
Re: The Problem with Vanity TLDs (2011)
#13Re: The Problem with Vanity TLDs (2011)
#14The prophecy didn't come true. Granted the big boys got their .googles and .amazons, but good old .coms are still a thing and not considered "cheaper".
Re: The Problem with Vanity TLDs (2011)
#15There is already http://microsoft.bing . See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Internet_top-level_dom... .
Re: The Problem with Vanity TLDs (2011)
#16I would tolerate the ICANN TLD money-grabbing scheme, but the "new" TLDs are a little more than an indication of bad taste. I can't be the only one to dislike anything more than 3 characters in a TLD, like .cloud or .engineering.
Additionally, I always found it interesting how the .xxx TLD never took off (was essentially DOA), even after they were so popular and valueable in the pre-sale auctions icann and others conducted b4 their introduction/release several years ago.
Re: The Problem with Vanity TLDs (2011)
#17I would tolerate the ICANN TLD money-grabbing scheme, but the "new" TLDs are a little more than an indication of bad taste. I can't be the only one to dislike anything more than 3 characters in a TLD, like .cloud or .engineering.
Re: The Problem with Vanity TLDs (2011)
#18I would tolerate the ICANN TLD money-grabbing scheme, but the "new" TLDs are a little more than an indication of bad taste. I can't be the only one to dislike anything more than 3 characters in a TLD, like .cloud or .engineering.
Re: The Problem with Vanity TLDs (2011)
#19I bought a LOT of .biz domains, turns out carriers often block people from receiving SMS messages containing email addresses at these TLDs, without notifying me or them. Probably because they're often used for spam? (I bought em because they were cheap.)
Re: The Problem with Vanity TLDs (2011)
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
What’s the problem with longer length tlds?
In practice URLs often cannot be more than 2K characters. It's also more work to type and bytes to transmit and harder to see on small screens. For many use cases these are irreverent, but they do matter to some.