Live data from Hacker News

Common Jobs in a Medieval City

medievalists.net

11–20 of 193 posts

Re: Common Jobs in a Medieval City

#11

Striking that there were more shoemakers than tailors.

4% of the workforce being shoemakers seems enormous. One person working full time making shoes for every fifty-ish adults?

I don't know what the right comparison is today. According to [0], the fashion industry accounts for about 3% of world GDP. Perhaps shoes are a quarter of that?

[0] https://fashinnovation.nyc/fashion-industry-statistics/

Re: Common Jobs in a Medieval City

#12
post #2

I wonder what the most common jobs are in a modern city. Probably all bullshit.

bullshit in whose opinion? As someone who does not believe in god, are all of the church related jobs bullshit? Or are they not, since a lot of people want churches and their services? If a job exists, there's apparently at least one person who wants it done.

Church worker; social worker: what's the difference?

Re: Common Jobs in a Medieval City

#13
post #2

I wonder what the most common jobs are in a modern city. Probably all bullshit.

It all boils down to what a good job means for a human. I may be special but I find a few axis that I need:

- skillful

- useful

- well organized enough

Today people don't do much, they don't master much, most of it is done far away in large shops or plants. It's rarely that useful (we're overwhelmingly comfy) and recent management practices are surreal most of the time.

I talked to a few people that prefered low wage in exchange for more skills or usefulness, even if the job might look less impressive in the first place.

Re: Common Jobs in a Medieval City

#14
post #2

I wonder what the most common jobs are in a modern city. Probably all bullshit.

bullshit in whose opinion? As someone who does not believe in god, are all of the church related jobs bullshit? Or are they not, since a lot of people want churches and their services? If a job exists, there's apparently at least one person who wants it done.

That's ignoring a lot of structure induced jobs. Often nobody wants it done but you can't fire a person so you invent a role. Or sometimes the need is mostly a factor of higher rank carelessness or incompetence.. fix the tooling and there's no need to hire 5 more guys to grind through endless papers or mails.

Re: Common Jobs in a Medieval City

#15

Striking that there were more shoemakers than tailors.

It's much easier to make clothes at home than shoes. I could probably cobble together an odd looking shirt given some time and instructions without needing to buy special tools, but leather shoes are an entirely different thing.

Re: Common Jobs in a Medieval City

#16
post #2

I wonder what the most common jobs are in a modern city. Probably all bullshit.

Probably not. Of course, it's highly dependent on how you group related professions, but according to [0], which has a granularity similar to our medieval source, the three most common occupations in New York in 2020 were retail salespeople, nurses and labourers. You need to get to 4 and 5 before the office and management jobs usually associated with the "bullshit jobs" epithet start to appear.

[0] https://stacker.com/new-york/new-york-city/most-common-jobs-...

Re: Common Jobs in a Medieval City

#17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

bullshit in whose opinion? As someone who does not believe in god, are all of the church related jobs bullshit? Or are they not, since a lot of people want churches and their services? If a job exists, there's apparently at least one person who wants it done.

I think the parent quote may be in reference to David Graeber's commentary on "bullshit jobs".

I figured as much. But I don't agree with the premise of the book. Sure, we all "know" the jobs are bullshit, and yet they aren't. Let's go over the wikipedia summary at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullshit_Jobs

>flunkies, who serve to make their superiors feel important, e.g., receptionists, administrative assistants, door attendants, makers of websites whose sites neglect ease of use and speed for looks;

They serve, hence, not a bullshit job. We might look down on it, but they are providing value to their employer. Sadly perhaps, humans are just deeply subjective. See again my religion example. Also, this seems really dismissive of receptionists/PAs. These people do a lot of real work.

>goons, who act to harm or deceive others on behalf of their employer, e.g., lobbyists, corporate lawyers, telemarketers, public relations specialists, community managers;

Not very nice no, but again they provide value to their bosses. Probably to themselves too.

>duct tapers, who temporarily fix problems that could be fixed permanently, e.g., programmers repairing bloated code, airline desk staff who calm passengers whose bags do not arrive;

This just seems to be naïve idealism.

>box tickers, who create the appearance that something useful is being done when it is not, e.g., survey administrators, in-house magazine journalists, corporate compliance officers, quality service managers;

Here it gets interesting. These people may actually be the first that don't provide value, but trick others into thinking they do.

>taskmasters, who manage—or create extra work for—those who do not need it, e.g., middle management, leadership professionals.

This is a mix of dumb (mis)managers, and malicious time wasters. I think it's obvious that a lot of resources of all kinds are wasted by inefficiencies caused by stupidity. That's a human (as in, we as a species) problem. Then there's malice, which fits into the "tricks others into believing they provide value" category.

Anyway, that's just my take on it.

Re: Common Jobs in a Medieval City

#18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

bullshit in whose opinion? As someone who does not believe in god, are all of the church related jobs bullshit? Or are they not, since a lot of people want churches and their services? If a job exists, there's apparently at least one person who wants it done.

Church worker; social worker: what's the difference?

That they are two massively different occupations, with different goals, different processes and different regulations they fall under. Just about the only thing they have the same is low salary.

Re: Common Jobs in a Medieval City

#19
post #6

Striking that there were more shoemakers than tailors.

I would expect that. Clothes last significantly longer than shoes (you can wear a cheap T-Shirt for way over 5 years, but even good midrange shoes start to fall apart after 2 years). It is also fairly easy to repair or even make clothes at home. But shoes?

Shoes might fall apart in 2 years if you wear them every day. Do you wear the same t-shirt every day?

Re: Common Jobs in a Medieval City

#20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the parent quote may be in reference to David Graeber's commentary on "bullshit jobs".

I figured as much. But I don't agree with the premise of the book. Sure, we all "know" the jobs are bullshit, and yet they aren't. Let's go over the wikipedia summary at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullshit_Jobs >flunkies, who serve to make their superiors feel important, e.g., receptionists, administrative assistants, door attendants, makers of websites whose sites neglect ease of use and speed for looks; They ser…

> flunkies, who serve to make their superiors feel important, e.g., receptionists, administrative assistants, door attendants, makers of websites whose sites neglect ease of use and speed for looks;

Imo, receptionists, administrative assistant and "makers of websites whose sites neglect ease of use and speed for looks" are all actually useful. Their function is not just to make someone feel superior. Instead, I would argue that whoever wrote that was caught in own feeling of superiority over service staff.

Post reply on HN