Good question. A follow-up: What's the best low(er)-digitalization EV (ideally BEV, but alternatively PHEV)? Something with more tactile/analog UI and a minimum of "entertainment" accessories?
Ask HN: Best cars without too much digitalization?
11–20 of 340 posts
Re: Ask HN: Best cars without too much digitalization?
#12Good question. A follow-up: What's the best low(er)-digitalization EV (ideally BEV, but alternatively PHEV)? Something with more tactile/analog UI and a minimum of "entertainment" accessories?
Re: Ask HN: Best cars without too much digitalization?
#13Re: Ask HN: Best cars without too much digitalization?
#14Re: Ask HN: Best cars without too much digitalization?
#15If you want a new car, instead of a used one, I'd try that same pattern: low end, low trim. Honda almost certainly sells a Civic without too many digital gimmicks, other automakers probably have the same.
It's a dying breed though, complicated "driver assist" systems are becoming standard or even mandated :(.
Re: Ask HN: Best cars without too much digitalization?
#16Surprised car makers haven't started trying to get ad revenue from displaying ads on cars' touchscreens
Re: Ask HN: Best cars without too much digitalization?
#17I wish they'd ditch the EV thing, put a 300hp motor in the front and find a price point around 40k.
They'd sell a whole lot of them
Re: Ask HN: Best cars without too much digitalization?
#18Base model mustang ecoboost is similar, you have to pay more to get the larger infotainment option but otherwise everything is manual including the hvac: https://www.ford.com/cars/mustang/models/ecoboost-fastback/ I assume the same would be true for the Camaro and Challenger
I would stay away from anything luxury. Family Haulers and Base model trucks are typically low-tech as well.
Re: Ask HN: Best cars without too much digitalization?
#19Re: Ask HN: Best cars without too much digitalization?
#20> For those of us who are "old-school" and prefer their cars without fancy digital gimmicks, which cars would you recommend? Old cars. The problem is the lack of modern safety features which really makes me do a double take before considering them. I wish cannibalizing a new car and ripping out all of the useless electronics was common enough for there to be tutorials for some brands
That's certainly true, but I do feel like there's a sweet spot in the 2005-2010 area where most "critical" safety features (improved airbags, traction control, ABS brakes) are almost certainly present, but none of the modern safety features that fall more into the "augmented sensory" category (merge/blindspot detection, early braking), which I'm happy to compromise on. I drive a 2007 SUV which does everything I need…
Late 90's saab 9000's have TCS, ABS, Dual Air Bag, so your standard set of 2000's features, and are also very safe.
Unfortunately there seems to be a lack of good crash test data publically on older (older than 2004) cars.