Live data from Hacker News

Candy CORN: analyzing the CORONA concrete crosses myth (2020)

thespacereview.com

11–20 of 20 posts

Re: Candy CORN: analyzing the CORONA concrete crosses myth (2020)

#13
post #2

The article says the exact opposite of that. Those marks weren't used for satellites.

The author says that, but he admits he's also not an expert and more of an arm-chair historian. So his analysis might not be correct either. It could all be false flag stuff: •They actually were used for this stuff, but don't want to admit it. •They weren't acctually used for this stuff, but want to make people think they were. •They were designed for one purpose, built and paid for by that purpose, but then ultimate…

I don't think anyone is particularly concerned with putting out false info for 1960s-era spy photography anymore. But I could be wrong. Or simply part of the coverup operation.

Re: Candy CORN: analyzing the CORONA concrete crosses myth (2020)

#15
There is substantial public documentation of the extensive system of calibration targets that were built for CORONA and subsequent satellite programs, such that it's hard to imagine why so much confusion seems to exist in this area. In fact Arizona was used for both, but satellite imaging calibration targets of various types are found in California and throughout the country. The most extensive system of photogrammetric calibration targets in the US is at Edwards AFB, where features include 10 mile reference rulers. Smaller references were sometimes just painted on the tarmac at air force bases for simplicity.

That said, these kinds of things are, necessarily, obvious and accessible to anyone. Calibration targets built for various programs are sometimes used for other programs, sometimes even by rival nations, simply because they're known to be there and it's easier to use something in place than to build something new. The fact that nearly all of these programs operated under great secrecy and before retention of classified records was typical (there were not yet as extensive of records retention mandates applicable to classified programs) means that the details can now be somewhat obscure, just because all of the original documentation was destroyed or lost after the program closed.

An interesting variety of calibration targets are those intended for radar (SAR) use, since they take the form of 3D shapes rather than 2D images. Since SAR is a much more recent technical development in remote sensing there are far fewer public details, but various military and contractor installations have included, at times, oddly carefully sculpted gravel piles that are assumed to serve this purpose. An example is at the former Lockheed site in Potrero Canyon near Beaumont, CA.

Many of the images covering the US taken by CORONA and several subsequent programs, mostly for calibration or testing but sometimes by error, were declassified under Clinton-era rules and given to the USGS. You can now browse them as part of USGS's general aerial imagery collection. The resolution is insufficient for most modern uses (the USGS's collection of agricultural aerial survey photos is far more useful), but they're unrivaled in the sheer land area they cover in one large frame.

Re: Candy CORN: analyzing the CORONA concrete crosses myth (2020)

#17
Having worked on a lot of the successors to Corona, I was surprised to see a full exhibit (including hardware) on display at the Smithsonian Udvar-Hazy Center near D.C.

Corona itself is completely unclassified now.

https://airandspace.si.edu/udvar-hazy-center

https://airandspace.si.edu/multimedia-gallery/si-97-15881-10...

https://airandspace.si.edu/multimedia-gallery/web10844-2008h...

Re: Candy CORN: analyzing the CORONA concrete crosses myth (2020)

#18

Google Maps link with sites marked: https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/viewer?mid=1IudNrZA1xnpWjK...

Thanks for sharing! Looks like a QR code from space.

Aha, that must be the reason! When another country's spy satellite flys over, instead of an image it takes them to a particular youtube video...

Like the person who put a QR code in to a mosaic tiled floor.

Re: Candy CORN: analyzing the CORONA concrete crosses myth (2020)

#19

Having worked on a lot of the successors to Corona, I was surprised to see a full exhibit (including hardware) on display at the Smithsonian Udvar-Hazy Center near D.C. Corona itself is completely unclassified now. https://airandspace.si.edu/udvar-hazy-center https://airandspace.si.edu/multimedia-gallery/si-97-15881-10... https://airandspace.si.edu/multimedia-gallery/web10844-2008h...

This is a bit off topic, but I have been an avid photographer on my spare time, and I have some nice lenses and tried others and looked through even more.

They get heavy and expensive quick and consumer zoom lenses dont go that far.

How in the world were they able to build optics for satellites sattlies that could see such details on the ground?

It seems like magic to me.

It is also frustrating because I would love to have a lens based on that technology.

Re: Candy CORN: analyzing the CORONA concrete crosses myth (2020)

#20

Having worked on a lot of the successors to Corona, I was surprised to see a full exhibit (including hardware) on display at the Smithsonian Udvar-Hazy Center near D.C. Corona itself is completely unclassified now. https://airandspace.si.edu/udvar-hazy-center https://airandspace.si.edu/multimedia-gallery/si-97-15881-10... https://airandspace.si.edu/multimedia-gallery/web10844-2008h...

This is a bit off topic, but I have been an avid photographer on my spare time, and I have some nice lenses and tried others and looked through even more. They get heavy and expensive quick and consumer zoom lenses dont go that far. How in the world were they able to build optics for satellites sattlies that could see such details on the ground? It seems like magic to me. It is also frustrating because I would love t…

https://dmtllc.org/
Post reply on HN