Live data from Hacker News

Impossible food sues to cancel earlier trademark owners

impossiblehq.com

11–20 of 205 posts

Re: Impossible food sues to cancel earlier trademark owners

#16
As a vegan myself this is very unfortunate because we are already easy targets and subject to a lot of prejudice. Impossible Meat bullying a small company might unleash a backlash of anti-vegan sentiment that can take on a life of its own. Make no mistake it has been there all along. Go back to other discussions about veganism here on HN and you will see the common anti-vegan memes. But when you're one of the leading brands of a minority movement like veganism you really need to make sure your PR is impeccable because your actions have broad-reaching effects beyond your business.

And to be 100% clear I am not being an apologist for Impossible. If they are indeed bullying and the case is as clear cut as this article describes then that is ugly behavior.

Re: Impossible food sues to cancel earlier trademark owners

#18
post #7

If the "later" impossible food succeeds in canceling the trademark, does that mean that any company can market their product as "impossible burgers"?

I'm sure their goal is to steal the trademark for their own exclusive use if they can swing that. Nullifying it so it is a generic term available to all would be worse for them than simply buying it from the rightful owners as they'd have to completely rebrand.

Re: Impossible food sues to cancel earlier trademark owners

#19
post #7

If the "later" impossible food succeeds in canceling the trademark, does that mean that any company can market their product as "impossible burgers"?

No, Impossible Food is suing to cancel Impossible HQ's trademark, and not their own. They want to be the only company allowed to use the "Impossible" branding, even though they weren't the first.
Post reply on HN