I like that 404 page. Also, the page you were actually looking for is probably https://on.ft.com/3lJQa6w Here’s an archive version of that link too https://archive.ph/62boB
I appreciate that you might think that, and thank you, but I was only interested in the 404 page.
The Financial Times’ 404 page
11–20 of 96 posts
Re: The Financial Times’ 404 page
#12It's a good page, but also gets posted quite often here https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...
Re: The Financial Times’ 404 page
#13Interesting. That specific page is blank but others redirect to a more useful 404 https://www.ft.com/thispagedoesnotexist
Re: The Financial Times’ 404 page
#14This is the kind of page tha the early internet thrived on. So quaint. Quirky. (Now it is all just becoming a big, walled, advertising network ... sigh.)
"Error 404 (Not Found)!!1"
Full disclosure I work at Google.
Re: The Financial Times’ 404 page
#15The old bloomberg 404 from some years ago was pretty good: https://web.archive.org/web/20160311202451/http://www.bloomb...
Re: The Financial Times’ 404 page
#16The old bloomberg 404 from some years ago was pretty good: https://web.archive.org/web/20160311202451/http://www.bloomb...
Re: The Financial Times’ 404 page
#17Interesting. That specific page is blank but others redirect to a more useful 404 https://www.ft.com/thispagedoesnotexist
There seems to be a bug that sometimes it responds with an empty page (0 content length) with a 404 code, and sometimes it responds with a full 404 page.
Re: The Financial Times’ 404 page
#18> HTTP Error 4O4 > 404 Unfound > The Web Server cannot give you the answers you need. Please check your life to ensure the path is correct. Did you press the right keys in sequence, and click with a firm but gentle hand? Are you paying attention? This may be a message, but it's not a mistake. > Please contact the server's administrator if chaos persists. > http://www.joseph.ca
As the child of this comment points out, I got this wrong. I was multi-tasking, and didn't read carefully enough.
If they delete their comment (which is now no longer relevant) then I'll delete this one and leave things tidy.
(they probably won't notice ...)
Re: The Financial Times’ 404 page
#19Here's the version from the wayback machine:
https://web.archive.org/web/20211024193418/https://www.ft.co...
Re: The Financial Times’ 404 page
#20I like that 404 page. Also, the page you were actually looking for is probably https://on.ft.com/3lJQa6w Here’s an archive version of that link too https://archive.ph/62boB
I appreciate that you might think that, and thank you, but I was only interested in the 404 page.