Live data from Hacker News

Steve, Please Buy Us A Carrier

mondaynote.com

11–20 of 47 posts

Re: Steve, Please Buy Us A Carrier

#11
Would it be possible for a carrier (Apple) to "serve one type of phone", as the article suggests? I guess the regulator would not allow that, requiring the use of standards (GSM, LTE,..)? On the other hand we do have SIM-locking already..

Second thought: Would a phone that doesn't support native apps, but HTML5, really be called a 'dumbphone'? Running Javascript even requires a faster CPU for the same experience.

Re: Steve, Please Buy Us A Carrier

#12
post #3

Apple had every opportunity to sell the iPhone standalone, without any participation from the carriers. Given the iPhone's obvious lure, especially when first released, Apple might have succeeded in upsetting the long-lamented model where devices are locked to and subsidized by carriers. They could have easily directed customers to purchase the iPhone and direct customers to purchase service separately. Why didn't th…

[deleted]

Re: Steve, Please Buy Us A Carrier

#13
It's interesting, but I have not had too many issues with ATT coverage recently. It's almost like they fixed things. Maybe it's just my area (Bay Area - Peninsula), but I wonder if everyone else is still regularly experiencing the claimed problems with AT&T.

Re: Steve, Please Buy Us A Carrier

#17
post #2

Fails the three primary market advantages that Apple always goes for: - Lots of opportunities to innovate (regulation and spectrum issues with the FCC, patents on the major wireless technologies involved, all the infrastructure equipment is produced/procured from 3rd parties) - Large profit margin (carriers aren't generally 40-60% margin operations like the rest of Apple) - Low ongoing overhead (lots of maintenance o…

You could make roughly the same points about the iTunes / record label relationship. If it were enough of a strategic advantage it might happen. I wouldn't cross your fingers though.

Re: Steve, Please Buy Us A Carrier

#18
post #17
post #2

Fails the three primary market advantages that Apple always goes for: - Lots of opportunities to innovate (regulation and spectrum issues with the FCC, patents on the major wireless technologies involved, all the infrastructure equipment is produced/procured from 3rd parties) - Large profit margin (carriers aren't generally 40-60% margin operations like the rest of Apple) - Low ongoing overhead (lots of maintenance o…

You could make roughly the same points about the iTunes / record label relationship. If it were enough of a strategic advantage it might happen. I wouldn't cross your fingers though.

Great point, I didn't realize it but you're right: like a carrier, iTunes is infrastructure.

Re: Steve, Please Buy Us A Carrier

#19

It's interesting, but I have not had too many issues with ATT coverage recently. It's almost like they fixed things. Maybe it's just my area (Bay Area - Peninsula), but I wonder if everyone else is still regularly experiencing the claimed problems with AT&T.

Given the length of time it takes to put up new towers, it is probably that the money they spent is finally showing some results. In ND they are in the middle of a transition from a local carrier they bought to themselves. It did not go smooth (total loss of network for a period and double billing customers), but the coverage is now getting better.

Re: Steve, Please Buy Us A Carrier

#20
post #3

Apple had every opportunity to sell the iPhone standalone, without any participation from the carriers. Given the iPhone's obvious lure, especially when first released, Apple might have succeeded in upsetting the long-lamented model where devices are locked to and subsidized by carriers. They could have easily directed customers to purchase the iPhone and direct customers to purchase service separately. Why didn't th…

Experience in market and a totally different type of phone are reasons. I am pretty sure some features required carrier support (i.e. Visual Voicemail). The initial data plans were also a bit different than a traditional offering. The iPhone was not a sure bet even with the backing of a carrier.
Post reply on HN