Comparing AWS's RDS and PlanetScale
11–17 of 17 posts
Re: Comparing AWS's RDS and PlanetScale
#12Great comparison, but i feel like it would be fair to mention support for foreign key constraints in the overview table (which planetscale doesn‘t have, afaik)
https://vitess.io/docs/reference/compatibility/mysql-compati...
Re: Comparing AWS's RDS and PlanetScale
#13Great comparison, but i feel like it would be fair to mention support for foreign key constraints in the overview table (which planetscale doesn‘t have, afaik)
Also no CTEs or window functions. More like MySQL 5.x support than 8.x. https://vitess.io/docs/reference/compatibility/mysql-compati...
Re: Comparing AWS's RDS and PlanetScale
#14(This is the same reason why, although there are excellent Redis-as-a-service products, it's hard to justify to use them at all.)
Re: Comparing AWS's RDS and PlanetScale
#15Re: Comparing AWS's RDS and PlanetScale
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also no CTEs or window functions. More like MySQL 5.x support than 8.x. https://vitess.io/docs/reference/compatibility/mysql-compati...
No transactions across shards is a bummer as well. Feels like planetscale might not be the best choice for small to medium projects, despite their improvements in developer experience.
4 years of Vitess in prod, also a maintainer
Re: Comparing AWS's RDS and PlanetScale
#17The “Trusted by” page has some pretty impressive flagship companies (GitHub, Slack, Square, AirBnb). Is anyone familiar with the role in which Planetscale is used at those companies? (Unless that is advertising users of vitess vs the hosted offering).