11–20 of 190 posts
Will they ground all the Tesla cars remotely? Or disable autopilot remotely? Until they have gathered new training data and updated the software?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Average humans have a higher error rate.
If you classify an image 30 times per second, then 0.001% is quite a large error rate.
AI related car accidents and deaths will have special places and dates, were they will repeat annually.
And at the same time, the UK government is looking at reversing the GDPR review right for automated decisions: Article 22 guarantees that people can seek a human review of an algorithmic decision, such as an online decision to award a loan, or a recruitment aptitude test that uses algorithms to automatically filter candidates. In May, a government task force set up to look for deregulatory dividends from Brexit, led…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Average humans have a higher error rate.
If you classify an image 30 times per second, then 0.001% is quite a large error rate.
If errors in any subsystem surface out to the car, well then okay. But it's not unlikely that the overall system would deal with an error in the image classifier.
What will happen if a deep-learning bug is found in Tesla autopilot where it misclassifies a fire truck for a bridge? Will they ground all the Tesla cars remotely? Or disable autopilot remotely? Until they have gathered new training data and updated the software?
Not saying cars should do the same, just that it's not absurd to consider it.
What will happen if a deep-learning bug is found in Tesla autopilot where it misclassifies a fire truck for a bridge? Will they ground all the Tesla cars remotely? Or disable autopilot remotely? Until they have gathered new training data and updated the software?
Yes, would you trust a car with an error rate of 0.001%?
Average humans have a higher error rate.
in my 20s you would need to bring the reckless back in.
And at the same time, the UK government is looking at reversing the GDPR review right for automated decisions: Article 22 guarantees that people can seek a human review of an algorithmic decision, such as an online decision to award a loan, or a recruitment aptitude test that uses algorithms to automatically filter candidates. In May, a government task force set up to look for deregulatory dividends from Brexit, led…
These people are such chumps. Automated hellscape for thee, but not for me.
What will happen if a deep-learning bug is found in Tesla autopilot where it misclassifies a fire truck for a bridge? Will they ground all the Tesla cars remotely? Or disable autopilot remotely? Until they have gathered new training data and updated the software?
To add context. In Aviation, if they do find a bug in the software running an airplane's engine they do ground planes until they know more about impact and mitigation. Not saying cars should do the same, just that it's not absurd to consider it.
And at the same time, the UK government is looking at reversing the GDPR review right for automated decisions: Article 22 guarantees that people can seek a human review of an algorithmic decision, such as an online decision to award a loan, or a recruitment aptitude test that uses algorithms to automatically filter candidates. In May, a government task force set up to look for deregulatory dividends from Brexit, led…