https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/16/fed-chief-powell-orders-ethi...
https://fortune.com/2021/07/08/house-speaker-nancy-pelosi-hu...
11–20 of 229 posts
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/16/fed-chief-powell-orders-ethi...
https://fortune.com/2021/07/08/house-speaker-nancy-pelosi-hu...
And their partners, parents, children, friends? This problem looks unsolvable to me.
And their partners, parents, children, friends? This problem looks unsolvable to me.
There are so many loop holes. I mean then they just make a company that does stock trades for them and tell that company what to trade. Or their spouse does the trades instead of them.
*purposeful loopholes
I would prefer a public registry listing all congressional trades. I know this is legally available data, but very difficult to access.
Banning stock trading for lawmakers in any form will even moreso restrict these positions to very wealthy people. If you’re worth several million, stock trading restrictions don’t change much. If you aren’t, they could be a big deciding factor in the quality of your housing or retirement.
For the vast majority of people this kind of passive index based investing is actually what will lead to the best returns overall. So I don't think your conclusion that this sort of change would restrict public office to very wealthy people is correct.
And their partners, parents, children, friends? This problem looks unsolvable to me.
Humorously, my trades and capital market activities are more regulated than Congressional representatives who have direct access to MNPI (material non public information), which I do not have access to. As this NPR piece alludes to, we should fix that.
And their partners, parents, children, friends? This problem looks unsolvable to me.
And their partners, parents, children, friends? This problem looks unsolvable to me.
They prevent the family of employees of companies that host contests and sweepstakes from participating, don’t they?