Live data from Hacker News

China’s dodgy-debt double act

economist.com

11–20 of 59 posts

Re: China’s dodgy-debt double act

#11
post #3

Is there any way to short evergrande, buy puts, etc.? I didn't find them listed in my brokerage. Is smart money already doing so? Any other dominos that will fall because of this, and similar plays to take advantage of them?

Timinig issues aside. Typically you cannot short something like this directly. But you can do it indirectly by going after ie. suppliers. For example short the Aussie dollar.

Re: China’s dodgy-debt double act

#12

It seems like the Chinese authorities are trying to deleverage by explicit policy (very evident in the stock market), here when the leverage in the western economies is at its highest. We in the west have a tendency to overestimate China's debt problems by comparing the numbers and ratios to that of the west. Forgetting that 1) China is very big and has a lot of people 2) most people in China are poor and live essent…

They have been investing in infrastructure, housing and energy. The return on that investment has been decreasing. The CCP has been kicking the can down the road as best it can trying to maintain growth numbers, which in part acts as justification for its single party rule.

Re: China’s dodgy-debt double act

#13
We live in very exciting times. The question isn't "Is China's economy good?" or "Is China's economy bad?". The question is "How will it perform relative to Europe and America?".

The US's economic fundementals aren't great. I'm expecting to see US government spending be the majority of GDP in my lifetime. That sort of centralised planning doesn't bode well for the West.

Re: China’s dodgy-debt double act

#14

It seems like the Chinese authorities are trying to deleverage by explicit policy (very evident in the stock market), here when the leverage in the western economies is at its highest. We in the west have a tendency to overestimate China's debt problems by comparing the numbers and ratios to that of the west. Forgetting that 1) China is very big and has a lot of people 2) most people in China are poor and live essent…

They have been investing in infrastructure, housing and energy. The return on that investment has been decreasing. The CCP has been kicking the can down the road as best it can trying to maintain growth numbers, which in part acts as justification for its single party rule.

You (and most other western commentators) underestimate just how long the road is.

Re: China’s dodgy-debt double act

#15
post #3

Is there any way to short evergrande, buy puts, etc.? I didn't find them listed in my brokerage. Is smart money already doing so? Any other dominos that will fall because of this, and similar plays to take advantage of them?

Buy puts on any Chinese ETF?

Re: China’s dodgy-debt double act

#16
The surreally large "shadow debt" that modern China has accumulated was my undergrad essay topic 10 years ago.

Since then, it seem to have grown from "surreally large" to "absurdreally large"

Go to any big Chinese city. Look around. Every skyscraper around is a mountain of secret debt few times its value.

China is really very close to Sri Lanka in how GDP numbers were financially engineered from massive, but well disguised debts on a nation-state scale

It is been very, very hard to take money out of China for a few months now. A sign of things soon to come, I believe.

Re: China’s dodgy-debt double act

#17
post #16

The surreally large "shadow debt" that modern China has accumulated was my undergrad essay topic 10 years ago. Since then, it seem to have grown from "surreally large" to "absurdreally large" Go to any big Chinese city. Look around. Every skyscraper around is a mountain of secret debt few times its value. China is really very close to Sri Lanka in how GDP numbers were financially engineered from massive, but well dis…

So why were you wrong, 10 years ago, when you assumed that the debt burdens were unsustainable?

Re: China’s dodgy-debt double act

#18
post #13

We live in very exciting times. The question isn't "Is China's economy good?" or "Is China's economy bad?". The question is "How will it perform relative to Europe and America?". The US's economic fundementals aren't great. I'm expecting to see US government spending be the majority of GDP in my lifetime. That sort of centralised planning doesn't bode well for the West.

So I thought "gov't spending, majority of GDP" was preposterous, but then I looked at the graph at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_spending_in_the_Uni...

Looks like it already blipped the 50% mark in WW2 and is quite close now. Seems to (visually) be leveling though.

Re: China’s dodgy-debt double act

#19

Chinese citizen living in US, posting anonymously for obvious reason. Huarong and evergrande are just the tip of the iceberg. If you wish to know what all the things fester below for CCP, here's a very timely summary video from laowhy86, one of the YouTube expert on China https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpwtZLzDM_o Unfortunately you will not find many outspoken Chinese native citizen on YouTube, for they all fear CCP…

Having watched that video, laowhy presents a biased view on the topic. Not a biased view of China mind you, but because his views echo the triumphant 90s zeitgest that capitalism, liberalism, and what can be cast as a "laissez-faire" attitude (supposedly being necessary to the development of a country) is for him the de-facto aka obvious best system. The underlying thread is still that "Fukuyama take" that capitalism and liberalism are the end-of-history.

Laowhy provides a compelling narrative, but it also feels like it is just that: a narrative.

China as a country has endured and has at hand many more tools to ensure its stability. It is not a simple dictature or the USSR, which could be brought to its knees via a mix of political and economic ostracism.

The video sadly feels like some feel-good geopolitical video for westerners: "don't worry about China because China worries about itself and hides it, badly".

Re: China’s dodgy-debt double act

#20
post #13

We live in very exciting times. The question isn't "Is China's economy good?" or "Is China's economy bad?". The question is "How will it perform relative to Europe and America?". The US's economic fundementals aren't great. I'm expecting to see US government spending be the majority of GDP in my lifetime. That sort of centralised planning doesn't bode well for the West.

So I thought "gov't spending, majority of GDP" was preposterous, but then I looked at the graph at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_spending_in_the_Uni... Looks like it already blipped the 50% mark in WW2 and is quite close now. Seems to (visually) be leveling though.

What is preposterous about it? If anything we can probably guess that the 40s to 80s were so nice because government spending went up. The 2008 blip was just the bank bailout.

It looks like government spending has stabilized 40 years ago. Considering how much the economy got "worse" from the perspective of the average because China got more powerful since 2000 it's actually strange how the numbers remained stable.

Post reply on HN