Earlier quoted context omitted.
Burying it and letting it rot would release the carbon. Logging it and turning it into lumber delays that process a lot longer.
There's research into this. Release to atmosphere from buried logs is minimal if done with that aim in mind: https://cbmjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1750-0... It's not onerous either, a hectare of trees can be sequestered in a 25m2 pit. Alternatively you can biochar it and then interr, but more labour and time intensive with the extra steps.
How to Plant the Forests of the Future
11–12 of 12 posts
Re: How to Plant the Forests of the Future
#12IMO this is a terrible idea. Humans love to try to engineer things and wind up mucking things up sticking their fingers in it. Think of all the invasive deliberately introduced species worldwide. In some cases it worked out, but the results were not predictable, in most cases it caused unforseen problems usually as bad as or worse than the one people were trying to solve. > Currently voluntary for foresters, transfer…
This is especially true of temperate forests, and temperate forests are, according to current understanding, the ones that sequester by far the most carbon. It’s partly to do with the soil being fungally dominant. Fungal soils also create their own weather, but they can’t do so if it gets too hot and dry or too tropical. The longer we wait to do something the less land there is to start a temperate forest.