Live data from Hacker News

What the interns have wrought, 2021 edition

blog.janestreet.com

11–20 of 71 posts

Re: What the interns have wrought, 2021 edition

#11
post #4
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Like most companies, Jane Street also doesn't discuss pay. However, as we reported last year, pay for U.S. trading interns at Jane Street in 2020 was $14.5k a month, plus an extra $500 a week work from home stipend (making $16.5k as a monthly total) for. From https://www.efinancialcareers.com/news/finance/jane-street-p...

They’re paying their interns how much ? Either finance pays way more than I thought, or that’s wildly off - for comparison as the most senior developer in our London based organisation, having been here since the beginning, I make about $11k a month.

Former Jane Streeter: yes, finance can pay very well. Of course there’s a lot of variance, but at least when I was there Jane Street made an effort to be the very highest in terms of compensation for interns. The numbers don’t seem off to me. Yes, I understand how ridiculous that is

Re: What the interns have wrought, 2021 edition

#12
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They’re paying their interns how much ? Either finance pays way more than I thought, or that’s wildly off - for comparison as the most senior developer in our London based organisation, having been here since the beginning, I make about $11k a month.

Jane Street interns are known (maybe not in this conversation :P) to get paid exceptionally well. A typical software engineering intern at a large Bay Area company is probably making something approaching $10k.

That’s about the ballpark for a paid SE intern in Germany (per annum, of course).

Re: What the interns have wrought, 2021 edition

#14
post #4
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Like most companies, Jane Street also doesn't discuss pay. However, as we reported last year, pay for U.S. trading interns at Jane Street in 2020 was $14.5k a month, plus an extra $500 a week work from home stipend (making $16.5k as a monthly total) for. From https://www.efinancialcareers.com/news/finance/jane-street-p...

They’re paying their interns how much ? Either finance pays way more than I thought, or that’s wildly off - for comparison as the most senior developer in our London based organisation, having been here since the beginning, I make about $11k a month.

A couple of other notes:

Finance non-competes seem to be MUCH more restrictive than tech. Also, you have to average 5-year comps... because Finance pay can be very volatile. Also, in tech, many more companies try to filter out non-team players during interviews.

Re: What the interns have wrought, 2021 edition

#15
post #4
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Like most companies, Jane Street also doesn't discuss pay. However, as we reported last year, pay for U.S. trading interns at Jane Street in 2020 was $14.5k a month, plus an extra $500 a week work from home stipend (making $16.5k as a monthly total) for. From https://www.efinancialcareers.com/news/finance/jane-street-p...

They’re paying their interns how much ? Either finance pays way more than I thought, or that’s wildly off - for comparison as the most senior developer in our London based organisation, having been here since the beginning, I make about $11k a month.

Jane Street pay graduates in London several hundred thousand pounds.

Re: What the interns have wrought, 2021 edition

#17
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They’re paying their interns how much ? Either finance pays way more than I thought, or that’s wildly off - for comparison as the most senior developer in our London based organisation, having been here since the beginning, I make about $11k a month.

Former Jane Streeter: yes, finance can pay very well. Of course there’s a lot of variance, but at least when I was there Jane Street made an effort to be the very highest in terms of compensation for interns. The numbers don’t seem off to me. Yes, I understand how ridiculous that is

I don't think it is ridiculous if you can afford to and want to pay the absolute top line to get the "best" (best by their metrics not everyone else's - not trying to spark a war).

If you are ultra profitable then the difference between paying market rate and top of market rate might be double the salary and that would still be a rounding error on a spreadsheet somewhere.

I guess it also depends how sensitive your output is to the quality of the developers, lots of enterprises I've worked for you'd be hard pressed to tell the difference between a competent developer and an excellent developer since the end result is from a distance pretty much the same in that case it would make no sense to pay more than will get you a bunch of competent developers.

My impression from the outside is that janestreet does see that value.

Some what correlated I love it when companies say "We hire the absolute best developers" and you ask what they pay and market-rate is the answer.

JaneStreet remains fascinating to me though because while they do programming and I'm a programmer we are almost different species because of the problems we solve - which makes it interesting to me.

Re: What the interns have wrought, 2021 edition

#18
post #4
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Like most companies, Jane Street also doesn't discuss pay. However, as we reported last year, pay for U.S. trading interns at Jane Street in 2020 was $14.5k a month, plus an extra $500 a week work from home stipend (making $16.5k as a monthly total) for. From https://www.efinancialcareers.com/news/finance/jane-street-p...

They’re paying their interns how much ? Either finance pays way more than I thought, or that’s wildly off - for comparison as the most senior developer in our London based organisation, having been here since the beginning, I make about $11k a month.

Finance pays at least as well as FAANGs (anecdote: in 2017 I had an offer from a FAANG and a finance company, the finance offer was slightly higher, and the FAANG flat-out refused to negotiate a finance offer), and also my sense is that salaries outside the US aren't keeping up at all with the US.

The salary numbers on https://levels.fyi seem to be plausible enough for US FAANG salaries, if you want an idea of what they look like.

Re: What the interns have wrought, 2021 edition

#19
post #13

Whenever I hear about Jane Street and other such trading companies I wonder what do they bring of value into the world. It seems they're basically just working on increasing economic equalities.

I personally think it's refreshingly honest to focus on moving a number up and to the right, rather than pretending to "make the world a better place" while the bottom-line is to move a number up and to the right.

Re: What the interns have wrought, 2021 edition

#20
post #13

Whenever I hear about Jane Street and other such trading companies I wonder what do they bring of value into the world. It seems they're basically just working on increasing economic equalities.

Are you interested in a genuine discussion on this topic or have you already made up your mind?

For those genuinely interested, for the most part trading firms employing quantitative and automated strategies look to keep the price of derivative or correlated assets in line with their underlying securities.

For example a stock ABC might either directly or indirectly represent two other underlying stocks FOO1 and FOO2 and a trading firm will create a model to determine the relationship between ABC, FOO1 and FOO2 so that ABC = f(FOO1, FOO2).

The role of trading firms then is to compete both on coming up with an accurate model (one firm might believe that the relationship is really ABC = f(FOO1, FOO2) while another firm models the relationship as ABC = g(FOO1, FOO2) and yet a third firm models the relationship as ABC = h(FOO2, FOO3) for some third asset FOO3) as well as premium (a firm will trade ABC = f(FOO1, FOO2) + small_fee and pocket that fee), as well as engineering aspects such as identifying cheaper costs to trade, providing fast execution etc etc...

In the absence of efficient trading strategies or market makers whose job is to maintain this price, what you get is ABC will trade at a huge spread and trades will cause the price of ABC to fluctuate significantly. Both of these properties are vaguely lumped together and called "liquidity" so that trading firms are said to provide liquidity to the market. They ensure that ABC is available to buy and sell at all times at a price that reflects its actual value at every moment in time.

If there's some kind of economic inequality created by keeping the price of assets tightly coupled to one another so that their price reflects their actual underlying value then you are welcome to take some time to present that argument.

From my point of view having done this now for close to 15 years, I find it to be a very interesting and challenging career that lets me consolidate knowledge from a variety of different fields. I get to study and put to use knowledge of many areas of computer science from machine learning, graphics/data visualization, compilers, databases, computer architecture, networking, as well as other fields such as physics, economics, law. I feel very privileged to be able to work in a multidisciplinary field and be able to see almost in real time the effect of my work. I worked as a software developer at Microsoft and Google prior to this and while those were both comfortable and pleasant places to work, it didn't compare in terms of feeling like you had an actual impact on anything. I felt at both of those companies like I was being paid a lot of money to do basically menial jobs.

There is nothing menial about working at a trading firm.

Post reply on HN