I don't think they should of included an image that triggers false positives in CSAM edit +reference https://www.hackerfactor.com/blog/index.php?/archives/929-On...
*should have
Black Hat USA 2021 Review
11–20 of 35 posts
Re: Black Hat USA 2021 Review
#12Looking forward to the videos - I wish they wouldn't hold them for 6 months. Actually, are there some "blackhat" sites that host the videos earlier? :)
Re: Black Hat USA 2021 Review
#13[deleted]
Re: Black Hat USA 2021 Review
#14Warning: this site use ~250MB of your data for all the photos. Mobile users, beware!
Re: Black Hat USA 2021 Review
#15Warning: this site use ~250MB of your data for all the photos. Mobile users, beware!
On my phone it opens the page almost instantly and then lazy loads each image as it comes into view.
Re: Black Hat USA 2021 Review
#16Warning: this site use ~250MB of your data for all the photos. Mobile users, beware!
On my phone it opens the page almost instantly and then lazy loads each image as it comes into view.
Strange, on desktop it pulls down all the images on page load.
The problem is not really about if the images are lazy-loaded or not though, the author is using the wrong format for the images. There are just 16 images, but each one is over 10MB big because the author is using PNG for photographs, when they really should be using JPG instead.
Re: Black Hat USA 2021 Review
#17Warning: this site use ~250MB of your data for all the photos. Mobile users, beware!
I mean that's what you get for using PNGs for pictures.
Re: Black Hat USA 2021 Review
#18Warning: this site use ~250MB of your data for all the photos. Mobile users, beware!
I mean that's what you get for using PNGs for pictures.
It's not the format but the image size. For example:
https://l3ouu4n9.github.io/2021/note/BHUSA/1.png - 37 megapixel - 50MB.
Re: Black Hat USA 2021 Review
#19Re: Black Hat USA 2021 Review
#20Warning: this site use ~250MB of your data for all the photos. Mobile users, beware!
It's almost like they are trying to overflow some buffer somewhere :)