Live data from Hacker News

Fish with 'human' teeth caught in North Carolina

bbc.com

11–20 of 27 posts

Re: Fish with 'human' teeth caught in North Carolina

#11
Let me guess by the title... a super common Sparidae?

Yep, nothing strange them. Every marine biologist, alive or past, know that sea breams that eat mainly shells have this set of teeth to tear and crush.

A much more interesting trivia is that this animal is hermaphrodyte so the journalists have lost their only chance to write something like 'mutating bisexual fish with human teeth and wearing a prison uniform, discovered'.

Re: Fish with 'human' teeth caught in North Carolina

#13
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm conflicted when it comes to things being reposted and framed at new on the internet. To many it is new. However, it's not new to me so it feels more click baity.

I’m all for introducing people to knew things, and reading about things I didn’t know about before, but this is just not honest reporting. It’s designed to get passed around on Facebook and if they make it seem ordinary, people won’t pass it around. They’ve taken a Facebook post, and editorialized it specifically to make it sound very special. If you wrote the same article about someone catching a salmon would you sa…

They call it "journalism". Has nothing to do with reality. It is really sad to see a lot of journalism being replaced by such stuff.

Re: Fish with 'human' teeth caught in North Carolina

#14
post #8
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm conflicted when it comes to things being reposted and framed at new on the internet. To many it is new. However, it's not new to me so it feels more click baity.

What surprises me is that BBC is offloading content from FB and making it their 'articles'/'news'. At the bottom of the 'article' there is a snippet: > The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. View original post on Facebook From top of the page it looks like standard news piece, filed under World / US & Canada. The 'article' does not mention that "it’s weird, but a known fish" as @aikinai stated…

The BBC have been making questionable editorial decisions over the last couple years in an effort to compete in the online news space. I imagine under the guise of keeping viewers around for the "real" hard hitting news stuff. The click bait is definitely growing.

I've also noticed they've become extremely trigger happy with regard to what can be classified as "breaking news". The label has lost all importance from being overused.

Re: Fish with 'human' teeth caught in North Carolina

#17

Most terrifying fish to catch, because bites fingers off. But edible.

but this may the only chance you have to actually reply "because it bit my finger so" to the question "why did you let it go?"

Best way to avoid problems is to let it bite on something. It latches on for few minutes and then you can try to kill it. Triggerfish especially has such an alien anatomy that it starts snapping fingers when already in the cooking pot.

Re: Fish with 'human' teeth caught in North Carolina

#18
post #11

Let me guess by the title... a super common Sparidae? Yep, nothing strange them. Every marine biologist, alive or past, know that sea breams that eat mainly shells have this set of teeth to tear and crush. A much more interesting trivia is that this animal is hermaphrodyte so the journalists have lost their only chance to write something like 'mutating bisexual fish with human teeth and wearing a prison uniform, disc…

This strikes me as an awfully cynical take. Most people aren't marine biologists it turns out.

Re: Fish with 'human' teeth caught in North Carolina

#19
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What surprises me is that BBC is offloading content from FB and making it their 'articles'/'news'. At the bottom of the 'article' there is a snippet: > The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. View original post on Facebook From top of the page it looks like standard news piece, filed under World / US & Canada. The 'article' does not mention that "it’s weird, but a known fish" as @aikinai stated…

The BBC have been making questionable editorial decisions over the last couple years in an effort to compete in the online news space. I imagine under the guise of keeping viewers around for the "real" hard hitting news stuff. The click bait is definitely growing. I've also noticed they've become extremely trigger happy with regard to what can be classified as "breaking news". The label has lost all importance from b…

Aren’t the BBC heavily influenced by the 77th?
Post reply on HN