Live data from Hacker News

The Linux Desktop Is Studded with Grifters

thelinuxdesktop.blog

11–16 of 16 posts

Re: The Linux Desktop Is Studded with Grifters

#11
Not really a linux story, its more "crowd funding doesn't work as an effective market in the presence of crooks"

And in a "bad money always chases out good money" crowdfunded projects seem mostly composed of noobs/crooks. Pros can't compete with infinite supply of people having no idea what they're doing or no intention to do anything, but willing to charge 10% less than the absolute minimum required for success, so pros can't participate in crowdfunding, the marketplace always becomes more toxic with time.

Re: The Linux Desktop Is Studded with Grifters

#12

Invoking Occam's Razor, I think that most people who come into the open-source community, promise the moon, and open a Patreon/paypal, actually believe that they can make a difference where so many others failed. They've just vastly underestimated how hard it is to accomplish their promised goal. Then they get defensive. They use the newly-discovered complexity as an excuse to keep accepting donations, and put projec…

Why would anybody invest in a project that doesn’t exist? This sounds like a case of the Emperor’s Clothes.

Re: The Linux Desktop Is Studded with Grifters

#13

Invoking Occam's Razor, I think that most people who come into the open-source community, promise the moon, and open a Patreon/paypal, actually believe that they can make a difference where so many others failed. They've just vastly underestimated how hard it is to accomplish their promised goal. Then they get defensive. They use the newly-discovered complexity as an excuse to keep accepting donations, and put projec…

Why would anybody invest in a project that doesn’t exist? This sounds like a case of the Emperor’s Clothes.

Well in VC the answer is "the founders worked at Google" or "the founders went to Stanford."

Re: The Linux Desktop Is Studded with Grifters

#14

Invoking Occam's Razor, I think that most people who come into the open-source community, promise the moon, and open a Patreon/paypal, actually believe that they can make a difference where so many others failed. They've just vastly underestimated how hard it is to accomplish their promised goal. Then they get defensive. They use the newly-discovered complexity as an excuse to keep accepting donations, and put projec…

The problem I think is largely due to lack of checks-and-balances. In the office you have investors who can apply pressure to management, who apply pressure to developers and hold them to a schedule; the lack of peer reviews (potentially) and transparency on the implementation are a problem too.

In the end, what is to stop the developers from walking away? They stand to lose nothing.

I think these platforms need to add legally binding contracts that will force developers to deliver or else they owe a large percentage of the money back (something like that).

Re: The Linux Desktop Is Studded with Grifters

#16
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would anybody invest in a project that doesn’t exist? This sounds like a case of the Emperor’s Clothes.

Well in VC the answer is "the founders worked at Google" or "the founders went to Stanford."

Brock Turner went to Stanford as well.
Post reply on HN