Live data from Hacker News

SafeDollar ‘stablecoin’ drops to $0 following DeFi exploit on Polygon

cryptoslate.com

11–20 of 577 posts

Re: SafeDollar ‘stablecoin’ drops to $0 following DeFi exploit on Polygon

#11

There is no such thing as a stablecoin, it's a made up term to try to lend legitimacy to new crypto scams. And I say this as someone who just bought some Ethereum in the hopes of making a profit :)

All terms are made up by your definition.

Re: SafeDollar ‘stablecoin’ drops to $0 following DeFi exploit on Polygon

#13

There is no such thing as a stablecoin, it's a made up term to try to lend legitimacy to new crypto scams. And I say this as someone who just bought some Ethereum in the hopes of making a profit :)

Isn't the whole value of your ethereum based on people using it for these kinds of scam projects?

Re: SafeDollar ‘stablecoin’ drops to $0 following DeFi exploit on Polygon

#14

These incidents really illustrate the main flaw of smart contracts: a single bug in your code can lead to incredible losses. I simply don't think it's possible for human beings to write good enough software for smart contracts.

How is that different from a traditional contract written by a lawyer? A single word could leave a huge unexpected hole in a traditional contract.

There's actually some chance that a poorly written contract, can be fixed / worked out between the parties involved.

Re: SafeDollar ‘stablecoin’ drops to $0 following DeFi exploit on Polygon

#15

There is no such thing as a stablecoin, it's a made up term to try to lend legitimacy to new crypto scams. And I say this as someone who just bought some Ethereum in the hopes of making a profit :)

Maybe the world just needs less people trying to get something for nothing. If the scammers operating these currencies teach the greedy traders a lesson we'll all be better off.

Re: SafeDollar ‘stablecoin’ drops to $0 following DeFi exploit on Polygon

#16

These incidents really illustrate the main flaw of smart contracts: a single bug in your code can lead to incredible losses. I simply don't think it's possible for human beings to write good enough software for smart contracts.

How is that different from a traditional contract written by a lawyer? A single word could leave a huge unexpected hole in a traditional contract.

The difference is that disputes are resolved by humans who attempt to determine intent.

Re: SafeDollar ‘stablecoin’ drops to $0 following DeFi exploit on Polygon

#18

These incidents really illustrate the main flaw of smart contracts: a single bug in your code can lead to incredible losses. I simply don't think it's possible for human beings to write good enough software for smart contracts.

I've seen them described as "self-funding bug bounties".

Re: SafeDollar ‘stablecoin’ drops to $0 following DeFi exploit on Polygon

#19

There is no such thing as a stablecoin, it's a made up term to try to lend legitimacy to new crypto scams. And I say this as someone who just bought some Ethereum in the hopes of making a profit :)

Isn't the whole value of your ethereum based on people using it for these kinds of scam projects?

Absolutely.

Re: SafeDollar ‘stablecoin’ drops to $0 following DeFi exploit on Polygon

#20

There is no such thing as a stablecoin, it's a made up term to try to lend legitimacy to new crypto scams. And I say this as someone who just bought some Ethereum in the hopes of making a profit :)

MakerDAO is not a scam, and the dollar peg survived the last crypto crash so it's pretty "stable".
Post reply on HN