11–20 of 41 posts
The author's write-up is better, and his target (Blender) enables some things mine (POV-Ray) doesn't.
I also really like the idea to use emissive textures. I just used point light sources.
I'm still rendering, and you can join if you want: https://qpov.retrofitta.se/
The motion blur is quite good here. Here is some light reading/watching on the subject. https://docs.blender.org/manual/en/latest/render/cycles/rend... https://youtu.be/VXIrSTMgJ9s In my estimation of things: motion blur is only beneficial to try to work around sample and hold displays. If there were fully continuous (1000 Hz is close enough) or sub 1 ms strobed displays then motion blur would add nothing.
All this work and then Youtube turns it into a smeary, illegible mess.
any effort to exemplify the characteristics or dynamics of path tracing is rendered immediately pointless by the gameplays insufferably sadistic nineties era bunny-hop autism as it makes a visible account of the gameplay all but impossible to follow. Path tracing a nauseating speed run holds almost zero value.
The motion blur is quite good here. Here is some light reading/watching on the subject. https://docs.blender.org/manual/en/latest/render/cycles/rend... https://youtu.be/VXIrSTMgJ9s In my estimation of things: motion blur is only beneficial to try to work around sample and hold displays. If there were fully continuous (1000 Hz is close enough) or sub 1 ms strobed displays then motion blur would add nothing.
The motion blur is quite good here. Here is some light reading/watching on the subject. https://docs.blender.org/manual/en/latest/render/cycles/rend... https://youtu.be/VXIrSTMgJ9s In my estimation of things: motion blur is only beneficial to try to work around sample and hold displays. If there were fully continuous (1000 Hz is close enough) or sub 1 ms strobed displays then motion blur would add nothing.
I find the motion blur distracting :(
The motion blur is quite good here. Here is some light reading/watching on the subject. https://docs.blender.org/manual/en/latest/render/cycles/rend... https://youtu.be/VXIrSTMgJ9s In my estimation of things: motion blur is only beneficial to try to work around sample and hold displays. If there were fully continuous (1000 Hz is close enough) or sub 1 ms strobed displays then motion blur would add nothing.
Counter point: Motion blur is a simple form of low-pass filtering (in the time direction). You need some kind of filtering to prevent shutter artifacts (think video of a spinning wheel), and that stays true even at a million fps.
Blurbusters has a fair amount of literature on this topic.
https://blurbusters.com/blur-busters-law-amazing-journey-to-...