Live data from Hacker News

Building enterprise focused startups that dont suck

techcrunch.com

11–13 of 13 posts

Re: Building enterprise focused startups that dont suck

#11
This article is bullshit. It suggests the Enterprise Software and its associated Sales can be fixed by changing the vendor's behaviour. But historically vendors became the way they are because of their large, slow, complex inefficient clients.

Also, open source is not a game changer. Proof: it's been around a while, and nothing's changed. It's just a new checkbox ("feature") that the client demands. Sure open source is great, but I know from experience that it doesn't fundamentally affect this situation.

Re: Building enterprise focused startups that dont suck

#12
post #6

I don't think the author understands the dynamics of the enterprise market. The companies mentioned in the article are definitely not the rule, and I don't see a trend here. I'm guessing that those companies don't have wide adoption across the largest of companies either. First, the person with the purse is not usually the end-user. Therefore, features, capabilities lists and slide decks are generally more valuable t…

The author's company has at least $10m in revenues.

Re: Building enterprise focused startups that dont suck

#13
IMHO, the "bottom-up" approach is the game-changer in the enterprise market.

With the freemium model, software can be basically given to the user; then, ASSUMING you have a strong product, that person will become your promoter within the organization. Get to the CIO through that user, if they are not enough keep building critical mass. Eventually the CIO will listen.

Right now, the enterprise has mis-alignment with the buyer and the user. Whatever can be done to bring that into proper alignment will in the end benefit the user.

Post reply on HN