Live data from Hacker News

"Irssi does not take a political stance"

github.com

11–20 of 34 posts

Re: "Irssi does not take a political stance"

#11

I don't understand what's supposed to be political here. We're not getting off Freenode because we don't like Andrew Lee's politics , we do because we have no faith at all in his skill as a network operator.

Some people who have an agenda against the "left" feel like everything is a witchhunt nowadays.

This is politics in the sense of "office politics". Not everything is a right vs. left divide.

Re: "Irssi does not take a political stance"

#12

I don't get the general "we are not political" idea. Everything is political. The conscious decision to stay put is as political as everything else. What they want to say is: "We don't want to get involved in this and save our face while doing so"

> Everything is political.

I wouldn't go that far. Irssi could have not taken a political stance, by ignoring what happened and not committing last week's change. But now that that's done, reverting it was political too. You can avoid a political issue, but once you ring the bell, you can't un-ring it.

Re: "Irssi does not take a political stance"

#14

I don't get the general "we are not political" idea. Everything is political. The conscious decision to stay put is as political as everything else. What they want to say is: "We don't want to get involved in this and save our face while doing so"

> Everything is political. I wouldn't go that far. Irssi could have not taken a political stance, by ignoring what happened and not committing last week's change. But now that that's done, reverting it was political too. You can avoid a political issue, but once you ring the bell, you can't un-ring it.

nah m8. everything is political. they’re basically saying they’re oke with the destruction of a community and the hostile intentions against FOSS because of one man’s megalomaniacal psyche.

anyone that thinks most decisions are apolitical are living in a vacuum tube or are just too privileged to give a shit. too many ppl in tech dont want to put themselves in another’s shoes

Re: "Irssi does not take a political stance"

#16
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Everything is political. I wouldn't go that far. Irssi could have not taken a political stance, by ignoring what happened and not committing last week's change. But now that that's done, reverting it was political too. You can avoid a political issue, but once you ring the bell, you can't un-ring it.

nah m8. everything is political. they’re basically saying they’re oke with the destruction of a community and the hostile intentions against FOSS because of one man’s megalomaniacal psyche. anyone that thinks most decisions are apolitical are living in a vacuum tube or are just too privileged to give a shit. too many ppl in tech dont want to put themselves in another’s shoes

> they’re basically saying they’re oke with the destruction of a community and the hostile intentions against FOSS because of one man’s megalomaniacal psyche.

I agree that the revert we're discussing did this and so was political. I'm saying that in the hypothetical world where this commit didn't exist but neither did last week's that it reverted, there irssi truly would be apolitical still.

Re: "Irssi does not take a political stance"

#17

I don't understand what's supposed to be political here. We're not getting off Freenode because we don't like Andrew Lee's politics , we do because we have no faith at all in his skill as a network operator.

Some people who have an agenda against the "left" feel like everything is a witchhunt nowadays.

I am very skeptical of certain aspects of the modern left. "Cancel culture" deeply worries me. Lee does not speak for me, and I think his behavior is much closer to cancel culture than that of his "opponents".

Frankly, Lee wishes this was a right vs left thing.

Re: "Irssi does not take a political stance"

#18
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

nah m8. everything is political. they’re basically saying they’re oke with the destruction of a community and the hostile intentions against FOSS because of one man’s megalomaniacal psyche. anyone that thinks most decisions are apolitical are living in a vacuum tube or are just too privileged to give a shit. too many ppl in tech dont want to put themselves in another’s shoes

> they’re basically saying they’re oke with the destruction of a community and the hostile intentions against FOSS because of one man’s megalomaniacal psyche. I agree that the revert we're discussing did this and so was political. I'm saying that in the hypothetical world where this commit didn't exist but neither did last week's that it reverted, there irssi truly would be apolitical still.

I'm not convinced that inaction is inherently apolitical, but it would certainly be more defensible.

Re: "Irssi does not take a political stance"

#19
post #9

I think it's a little ironic that someone who hasn't seemed to have committed to the codebase of irssi for years has decided to come in and put their foot down in such an aggressive way. Funny, I feel like I JUST saw something like this happen somewhere else...

We all saw it in many other places.

Re: "Irssi does not take a political stance"

#20
post #9

I think it's a little ironic that someone who hasn't seemed to have committed to the codebase of irssi for years has decided to come in and put their foot down in such an aggressive way. Funny, I feel like I JUST saw something like this happen somewhere else...

It's quite concerning that ailin-nemui, who made the prior commit migrating to Libera currently isn't listed as part of the irssi organization[1]. According to GitHub stats, this is the person behind most of the code in irssi[2].

[1]: https://github.com/orgs/irssi/people

[2]: https://github.com/irssi/irssi/graphs/contributors

Post reply on HN