11–20 of 406 posts
Reminds me of the outrage™ when US newspapers blocked connections from Europe over the GDPR. Regulations have consequences. Not all those consequences are the consequences you want. Sometimes exiting a small market looks like a better option than compliance. Sometimes HN downvotes posts for challenging a political crusade by pointing out what it did to those who promoted it. ;)
My sympathy is with the employers. Colorado did this to itself with such an anticompetitive law. Beyond this effect, it also encourages sending the work offshore altogether.
Reminds me of the outrage™ when US newspapers blocked connections from Europe over the GDPR. Regulations have consequences. Not all those consequences are the consequences you want. Sometimes exiting a small market looks like a better option than compliance. Sometimes HN downvotes posts for challenging a political crusade by pointing out what it did to those who promoted it. ;)
Is Europe a small market?
My sympathy is with the employers. Colorado did this to itself with such an anticompetitive law. Beyond this effect, it also encourages sending the work offshore altogether.
My sympathy is with the employers. Colorado did this to itself with such an anticompetitive law. Beyond this effect, it also encourages sending the work offshore altogether.
Reminds me of the outrage™ when US newspapers blocked connections from Europe over the GDPR. Regulations have consequences. Not all those consequences are the consequences you want. Sometimes exiting a small market looks like a better option than compliance. Sometimes HN downvotes posts for challenging a political crusade by pointing out what it did to those who promoted it. ;)
Is Europe a small market?
Reminds me of the outrage™ when US newspapers blocked connections from Europe over the GDPR. Regulations have consequences. Not all those consequences are the consequences you want. Sometimes exiting a small market looks like a better option than compliance. Sometimes HN downvotes posts for challenging a political crusade by pointing out what it did to those who promoted it. ;)
If a company doesn't already have Colorado employees, they may not be interested in having a remote employee in CO that requires special treatment.
My sympathy is with the employers. Colorado did this to itself with such an anticompetitive law. Beyond this effect, it also encourages sending the work offshore altogether.
What competition is being hampered by this law?