Not much they can do to her in Russia. I also assume she's smart enough not to keep anything important in her iCloud.
> Not much they can do to her in X I think you really underestimate the power of smear/ blackmail campaigns and how effectively they have worked in the last century for the intelligence services. This has nothing to do with upholding the law.
FBI subpoenaed Apple for data of Sci-Hub founder
11–20 of 272 posts
Re: FBI subpoenaed Apple for data of Sci-Hub founder
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Not much they can do to her in X I think you really underestimate the power of smear/ blackmail campaigns and how effectively they have worked in the last century for the intelligence services. This has nothing to do with upholding the law.
Look what happened to Kim Dotcom over US copyright at the behest of the corporate content owners: swat team, extradition hearings, the works. The US penalties are greater than murder.
Re: FBI subpoenaed Apple for data of Sci-Hub founder
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Not much they can do to her in X I think you really underestimate the power of smear/ blackmail campaigns and how effectively they have worked in the last century for the intelligence services. This has nothing to do with upholding the law.
Look what happened to Kim Dotcom over US copyright at the behest of the corporate content owners: swat team, extradition hearings, the works. The US penalties are greater than murder.
Re: FBI subpoenaed Apple for data of Sci-Hub founder
#14> Following a 2015 lawsuit brought in the US by the publisher Elsevier, Elbakyan remains in hiding due to the risk of extradition; Elsevier was granted an injunction against her and $15 million in damages. Elbakyan and Sci-Hub were again involved in a US lawsuit in 2017, this time with the American Chemical Society. ACS sued the site for copyright and trademark violations, and conversion. Later that year, the court ruled in favor of ACS, fining Sci-Hub $4,800,000 in damages, enjoining further infringement, and prohibiting search engines and domain name registries from "facilitating access" to Sci-Hub.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandra_Elbakyan#Creating_Sc...
Re: FBI subpoenaed Apple for data of Sci-Hub founder
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Not much they can do to her in X I think you really underestimate the power of smear/ blackmail campaigns and how effectively they have worked in the last century for the intelligence services. This has nothing to do with upholding the law.
Look what happened to Kim Dotcom over US copyright at the behest of the corporate content owners: swat team, extradition hearings, the works. The US penalties are greater than murder.
Re: FBI subpoenaed Apple for data of Sci-Hub founder
#16Re: FBI subpoenaed Apple for data of Sci-Hub founder
#17Alexandra Elbakyan is a hero. Nothing less than that. Let's celebrate her and the memory of Aaron Swartz. Swartz was pushed to suicide because this oppressive system. Let's fight against this. Let's put our money and time to sustain Elbakyan's effort to open science.
Re: FBI subpoenaed Apple for data of Sci-Hub founder
#18Not much they can do to her in Russia. I also assume she's smart enough not to keep anything important in her iCloud.
> Not much they can do to her in X I think you really underestimate the power of smear/ blackmail campaigns and how effectively they have worked in the last century for the intelligence services. This has nothing to do with upholding the law.
It had everything to do with New Zealand politicians trying to impress the powerful. It’s was embarrassing.
Said as a New Zealander.
Re: FBI subpoenaed Apple for data of Sci-Hub founder
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
Look what happened to Kim Dotcom over US copyright at the behest of the corporate content owners: swat team, extradition hearings, the works. The US penalties are greater than murder.
I don't understand one thing. Why Germany didn't interfere extradiction? (I assume that he held Germany citizenship)
Re: FBI subpoenaed Apple for data of Sci-Hub founder
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
Look what happened to Kim Dotcom over US copyright at the behest of the corporate content owners: swat team, extradition hearings, the works. The US penalties are greater than murder.
I don't understand one thing. Why Germany didn't interfere extradiction? (I assume that he held Germany citizenship)